The legislation forms part of the government’s broader agenda to strengthen public institutions, modernise key sectors of the economy, improve revenue mobilisation and address long-standing structural challenges.

Below is a breakdown of the 12 bills and what they seek to achieve.

1. Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, 2025

Passed: 29 May 2026

The bill seeks to promote what it describes as Ghanaian family values by prohibiting activities relating to LGBTQ+ advocacy, promotion and related practices. It also prescribes sanctions for certain acts prohibited under the legislation. The bill has generated significant public, legal and international debate over human rights, constitutional freedoms and cultural values.

2. Ghana Investment Promotion Authority Bill, 2025

Passed: 25 June 2026

The bill establishes a new Ghana Investment Promotion Authority, replacing the existing investment promotion framework. It seeks to improve Ghana’s investment climate, streamline investor services, strengthen investment regulation and position the country to attract both local and foreign direct investment.

3. Maritime and Related Offences Bill, 2026

Passed: 30 June 2026

The legislation strengthens Ghana’s legal framework for combating maritime crimes, including piracy, armed robbery at sea, illegal fishing, trafficking and other offences committed within the country’s maritime domain. It aligns Ghana’s laws with international maritime conventions and enhances maritime security.

4. Community Service Bill, 2026

Passed: 8 July 2026

The bill introduces community service as an alternative sentencing option for certain categories of offenders. The objective is to reduce prison overcrowding, promote rehabilitation and allow offenders convicted of minor offences to make positive contributions to society.

5. National Defence University, Ghana Bill, 2026

Passed: 17 July 2026

The bill establishes the National Defence University of Ghana to provide advanced military education, research and professional training for members of the Ghana Armed Forces and other security agencies, while supporting national security policy development.

6. Value Added Tax (Amendment) Bill, 2026

Passed: 29 July 2026

The amendment revises aspects of Ghana’s VAT regime to improve tax administration, enhance compliance and implement government tax policy reforms announced in the 2026 Budget. It also seeks to simplify certain VAT processes and improve domestic revenue mobilisation.

7. Income Tax (Amendment) Bill, 2026

Passed: 29 July 2026

This amendment updates provisions of the Income Tax Act to reflect government tax policy changes, improve tax administration and provide clarity on selected tax obligations for individuals and businesses.

8. Tribunals Bill, 2026

Passed: 30 July 2026

The bill reforms the administration and operation of tribunals in Ghana by providing a modern legal framework governing their establishment, jurisdiction, composition and procedures, with the aim of improving access to justice and the efficiency of dispute resolution.

9. Customs Bill, 2026

Passed: 30 July 2026

The Customs Bill modernises Ghana’s customs laws by strengthening border management, facilitating legitimate trade, improving revenue collection and enhancing measures against smuggling and customs-related offences.

10. Excise Bill, 2026

Passed: 30 July 2026

The Excise Bill consolidates and modernises the legal framework governing excise duties on selected locally manufactured and imported goods. It seeks to improve tax administration and strengthen domestic revenue collection.

11. Ghana Cocoa Board Bill, 2026

Passed: 31 July 2026

The bill reforms the legal framework governing the Ghana Cocoa Board (COCOBOD), with the objective of strengthening governance, improving operational efficiency, enhancing financial management and supporting the long-term sustainability of Ghana’s cocoa sector.

12. Energy Sector Levies (Amendment) Bill, 2026

Passed: 31 July 2026

The amendment revises aspects of the Energy Sector Levies Act by increasing levies on fuel oil and extending the Road Fund Levy to fuel oil. According to the government, the changes are intended to plug revenue leakages, curb abuse within the fuel subsidy regime and strengthen financing for the energy sector, while maintaining tax refunds for legitimate industrial users through a post-payment refund mechanism.

A busy legislative session

The passage of the 12 bills highlights Parliament’s focus on advancing reforms across several sectors, including taxation, investment promotion, national security, maritime governance, justice, education, energy and agriculture.

Several of the laws implement government policy commitments announced in the 2026 Budget, while others establish new institutional and legal frameworks intended to improve governance, strengthen public service delivery and enhance Ghana’s long-term economic competitiveness.

Click here for details on the bills.

According to him, although he was frustrated when he first heard reports of the ruling, reading the 94-page judgment later convinced him that the appellate court had valid reasons for overturning the earlier conviction.

Speaking on Joy Prime’s Prime Insight on Saturday, August 1, Mr Owusu said he initially reacted strongly after receiving news of the decision.

He explained that the breaking news immediately triggered concerns about the outcome of the case, but he later decided to hold back and seek a better understanding of the court’s reasoning.

“I was somewhere when I got a breaking news from one of the media outlets that said Sedina Tamakloe has been acquitted and discharged. Instantly, I was boiled up. I was so furious,” he said.

Mr Owusu said he later reconsidered his position and chose to read the full judgment before making any public comments.

He said he obtained a copy of the court’s 94-page ruling about three hours after the announcement and spent several hours studying the reasons given by the judges.

According to him, his view changed significantly after going through the details of the judgment.

“I printed it, did the binding, and it took four hours to read it. When I read the judgment, immediately I became scandalised. I said, ‘What? Why must we sit down for innocent souls to be done in this manner?’” he recounted.

Mr Owusu added that the experience reinforced the importance of understanding court decisions fully before drawing conclusions, particularly in cases involving serious legal and public interest issues.

Don’t pay anyone to facilitate your recruitment – Police

Speaking on JoyNews’ Newsfile programme on Saturday, August 1, Mr Fuseini said the ruling was a reminder that Ghana’s criminal justice system must uphold the principle that every accused person is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt.

“The prosecution must always seek justice in the matter and not be in a hurry to convict,” he said.

According to the former Tamale Central Member of Parliament, prosecutors who prioritise convictions over justice risk undermining public confidence in the criminal justice system.

“It’s an overzealous prosecutor who puts conviction over justice,” he stated.

Mr Fuseini further argued that circumstances surrounding an accused person, including leaving the jurisdiction or being absent during trial, should not reduce the prosecution’s responsibility to prove its case to the required legal standard.

“Running away or being outside the jurisdiction should not relieve the prosecution of their burden to prove beyond reasonable doubt,” he added.

His comments follow the Court of Appeal’s decision on Thursday to overturn Ms Tamakloe-Attionu’s conviction and 10-year prison sentence.

The appellate court held that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt and consequently set aside the convictions entered against the former MASLOC boss by the High Court.

Ms Tamakloe-Attionu was convicted in absentia before she was extradited from the United States to Ghana on June 9, 2026. She began serving her sentence at the Nsawam Medium Security Female Prison on June 24 before successfully challenging the conviction at the Court of Appeal.

Following the judgment, Attorney-General and Minister for Justice, Dr Dominic Ayine, announced that the state would appeal the decision at the Supreme Court, indicating that the legal battle over the high-profile case is not yet over.

Two killed, 10 injured in Dompoase crash on Cape Coast–Takoradi Highway

OSP, Attorney General dispute unnecessary rivalry – Dr. Asante-Otchere

According to him, the controversy surrounding the respective roles of the OSP and the Office of the Attorney General could have been avoided through stronger collaboration and coordination between the two state institutions.

Speaking on The Big Issue on Channel One TV on Saturday, August 1, Dr Asante-Otchere said both offices share a common objective of protecting the public interest, safeguarding state resources and ensuring accountability in corruption-related matters.

He argued that the focus should be on cooperation rather than competition, as both institutions are working towards the same national interest.

“If you do not have an OSP that is coordinating with the Attorney General, not necessarily being subservient to that office, but there is the need for that coordination because we are fighting the same battle, and what is that battle? To ensure that the state does not lose out in terms of resources and finances,” he said.

“We are on the same page because we are all prosecuting and fighting for a common good, and so there is that need for coordination. In actual fact, there was no need for the Supreme Court’s interpretation; I think it was just an ego clash.”

His comments follow the Supreme Court’s ruling on the prosecutorial powers of the Office of the Special Prosecutor.

The apex court held that while the OSP has the legal authority to prosecute criminal cases within its mandate, the Attorney General retains constitutional powers to discontinue or terminate prosecutions at any stage of proceedings.

Dr Asante-Otchere maintained that closer institutional cooperation would help strengthen Ghana’s fight against corruption and prevent unnecessary legal conflicts between state agencies.

Oliver Barker-Vormawor demands broader state support for party primaries

Mr Barker-Vormawor argues that concerns over cost should not derail efforts to deepen internal democracy.

Speaking on JoyNews’ Newsfile programme on Saturday, August 1, Mr Barker-Vormawor maintained that, although the new electoral system may not completely eradicate the influence of money in politics, it represents a significant step towards creating a more inclusive and democratic political process.

“The mere fact that this may not entirely eliminate money in our politics doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try,” he said.

His comments follow the Supreme Court’s 5–2 majority decision, delivered on Wednesday, July 29, which declared that all registered members in good standing of political parties must be permitted to participate in the selection of party leaders and electoral candidates.

The judgement effectively dismantles Ghana’s long-standing delegate system, replacing it with a “one member, one vote” framework that is expected to transform internal party elections across the country.

Since the ruling, questions have emerged about the financial implications of expanding internal party elections from a relatively small pool of delegates to the entire membership of political parties.

Addressing those concerns, Mr Barker-Vormawor argued that while organising nationwide primaries under the new system would undoubtedly require greater resources, the issue should be viewed within the broader context of public investment already made in Ghana’s democratic institutions.

He noted that the state already shoulders significant responsibilities during political party primaries, particularly through the Electoral Commission’s supervisory role.

“We have to admit to ourselves that there is already enough state funding that goes into our political parties’ primaries,” he said.

According to him, the Electoral Commission’s involvement demonstrates that taxpayers already contribute to the administration of internal political contests.

“The mere presence of the Electoral Commission in supervising our elections—these are people that we pay,” he observed.

Mr Barker-Vormawor argued that rather than focusing solely on the increased financial burden that could accompany the “one member, one vote” system, Ghana should engage in a broader policy discussion about how democratic processes ought to be funded.

He suggested that policymakers should carefully consider the extent to which the state should continue to support political parties in conducting internal elections as the new system takes effect.

“We have to have a holistic conversation about what is the extent of how the state picks up some of the bill as this goes forward,” he stated.

He indicated that such discussions should balance the need for broader democratic participation with the practical realities of organising large-scale internal elections.

Mr Barker-Vormawor also challenged suggestions that the Supreme Court’s ruling would impose an entirely new financial obligation on political parties.

According to him, it is inaccurate to suggest that Ghana’s democratic system currently leaves parties to bear the full cost of organising their internal elections.

“But also importantly, it is not true that our democracy imposes any cost on our political parties at all,” he said.

ALSO:

Gary Nimako questions Court of Appeal’s decision to acquit Sedina Tamakloe

Armed robbers attack two VIP JEOUN buses, five injured

Speaking on JoyNews’ Newsfile programme on Saturday, August 1, Mr Nimako said a comparison of both cases revealed similarities in the legal issues involved, arguing that the reasoning adopted by the appellate court in the Sedina case provides grounds for optimism regarding Chairman Wontumi’s appeal.

“This judgment, as it stands, gives me hope in Wontumi’s appeal. Yes, because if you read Wontumi’s judgment at the High Court, and the manner in which the conviction took place, and you juxtapose that judgment vis-a-vis this particular judgment, then clearly, I can tell the people that look, Wontumi will succeed in an appeal, if you take this judgment into consideration,” he stated.

His comments follow the Court of Appeal’s decision to set aside the conviction and 10-year prison sentence imposed on Ms Tamakloe-Attionu by the High Court over alleged financial irregularities involving MASLOC funds.

The appellate court acquitted and discharged the former MASLOC boss after allowing her appeal against both the conviction and sentence.

Mr Nimako argued that the legal principles applied in the Sedina case could equally influence the outcome of Chairman Wontumi’s appeal, as he challenges a 20-year custodial sentence imposed by the High Court over offences related to illegal mining activities.

He maintained that there are common legal issues between the two cases and said the Court of Appeal’s latest decision had reinforced his belief that the conviction against Chairman Wontumi could be overturned.

Chairman Wontumi has filed an appeal against both his conviction and sentence, arguing that the High Court erred in its findings. The Court of Appeal is expected to determine whether the trial court properly applied the law and assessed the evidence before arriving at its decision.

He is currently serving his sentence while his legal team pursues the appeal.

In the MASLOC case, the Court of Appeal unanimously held that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt and consequently overturned the convictions entered against Ms Tamakloe-Attionu by the High Court.

Her appeal challenged both the substance of the conviction and the legality of her trial and sentencing in absentia. Her lawyers argued that the charges were defective and that the prosecution failed to establish the offences against her.

Ms Tamakloe-Attionu was extradited from the United States to Ghana on June 9, 2026, and began serving her 10-year sentence at the Nsawam Medium Security Female Prison on June 24 before the Court of Appeal quashed the conviction.

The ruling has sparked debate among legal practitioners, governance experts and anti-corruption advocates, with differing views on whether it highlights weaknesses in the prosecution’s case or broader challenges within Ghana’s criminal justice system.

ALSO:

Gary Nimako questions Court of Appeal’s decision to acquit Sedina Tamakloe

Sedina Tamakloe-Attionu’s acquittal: Manasseh Azure expresses disappointment

Speaking on JoyNews’ Newsfile programme on Saturday, August 1, Mr Nimako Marfo said he had read the judgment in full and concluded that while some parts of the court’s reasoning were sound, other aspects went beyond the legal threshold required in criminal prosecutions.

He argued that the decision appeared to require the prosecution to prove its case “beyond a shadow of a doubt,” a standard he believes is higher than what the law demands.

“I have read the judgment in its entirety. There are portions of the judgment I tend to agree with the Court of Appeal. There are portions where I think it was an overreach because it tends to place a very high burden on prosecutors to prove an accused person’s guilt beyond a shadow of a doubt, and that I have a problem with. Overturning the conviction and the sentencing, I thought maybe they could have asked for a retrial at the High Court,” he said.

His comments follow Thursday’s Court of Appeal ruling, which overturned the High Court’s conviction and 10-year prison sentence imposed on Ms Tamakloe-Attionu over offences relating to the management of MASLOC funds.

Following the judgment, the Attorney-General and Minister for Justice, Dr Dominic Ayine, announced that the state would appeal the decision at the Supreme Court.

Gideon Boako warns against one-party dominance in Parliament

Speaking JoyNews’ Newsfile programme, Manasseh said there have been moments in his career when he questioned whether investigative journalism was worth the sacrifices, particularly when evidence of wrongdoing fails to lead to accountability.

“There have been times in my life when I have asked myself whether it is even worth it,” he said, adding that it is disheartening when “everybody knows that wrong has been done” but no one is ultimately made to account for it.

According to him, the emotional toll is significant because investigative journalism often involves considerable time, effort and personal risk.

He said several investigations he has undertaken, despite being backed by documentary evidence, have produced little or no tangible action.

As an example, Manasseh referred to his investigations into the controversial ambulance procurement deal, which raised questions about the acquisition of ambulances at a cost running into millions of euros.

He recalled that the investigations uncovered evidence of irregularities and also highlighted concerns that some of the ambulances remained parked at the Air Force Base for years instead of being deployed to health facilities.

He noted that regardless of the outcome, the financial burden of such transactions is ultimately borne by the Ghanaian taxpayer.

Commenting on the recent  Court of Appeal decision to acquit and discharge former Chief Executive of the Microfinance and Small Loans Centre (MASLOC), Sedina Tamakloe-Attionu after her conviction on about 78 criminal charges, Manasseh said he had carefully studied both the appellate  court‘s judgment and the earlier High Court ruling.

He said he agreed with some aspects of the Court of Appeal’s reasoning, noting that the case exposed lessons for investigators, prosecutors and investigative journalists regarding the gathering and presentation of evidence.

At the same time, he said he found parts of the judgment difficult to reconcile with the prosecution’s case, particularly on issues relating to procurement.

In his view, some aspects appeared to favour the defence, although he stressed that he was expressing a personal opinion as a layperson rather than making a legal assessment.

Manasseh said the case should serve as an opportunity for institutions involved in investigations and prosecutions to strengthen their work so that genuine cases of wrongdoing are effectively pursued and accountability is not lost because of avoidable weaknesses.

Gideon Boako warns against one-party dominance in Parliament

Speaking in Parliament on Friday, July 31, Dr Boako said the government’s numerical strength in the House has made it difficult for concerns raised by the Minority to influence policy decisions, particularly on tax-related legislation.

He alleged that the government’s handling of recent tax proposals shows a disregard for opposing views, insisting that Parliament must serve as a strong institution for checks and balances rather than merely endorsing government policies.

“It seems this government fancies burdening the Ghanaian taxpayer with more taxes. The supermajority Ghanaians gave them is being abused. No matter what the Minority says, they don’t care,” he stated.

Dr Boako urged Ghanaians to consider the importance of a balanced Parliament in future elections, adding that no political party should be allowed to gain excessive dominance in the legislature.

“Ghana should never make the mistake of giving one political party such a supermajority in Parliament,” he added.

It seems this gov’t fancies burdening the Ghanaian taxpayer with more…

Speaking on JoyNews’ Newsfile on Saturday, August 1, Mr Awuni said the appellate court’s decision had left him questioning whether the sacrifices associated with investigative journalism were worthwhile.

“I feel the same way I felt when I first heard of the appeal and the outcome,” he said.

“There have been times in my life when I have asked myself whether it is even worth it. And this has been one of those instances where everybody knows that wrong has been done.”

His comments come two days after the Court of Appeal overturned Ms Tamakloe-Attionu’s conviction and 10-year prison sentence.

In its judgment delivered on Thursday, the three-member panel held that the prosecution had failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, setting aside the convictions imposed by the High Court.

The ruling followed an appeal filed by Ms Tamakloe-Attionu challenging both her conviction and the legality of being tried and sentenced in absentia. Her lawyers argued that the charges were defective and that the prosecution failed to prove the offences against her.

Ms Tamakloe-Attionu was extradited from the United States to Ghana on June 9, 2026, and began serving her 10-year sentence at the Nsawam Medium Security Female Prison on June 24 before the Court of Appeal overturned her conviction.

Reflecting on the judgment, Mr Awuni lamented what he described as a lack of consequences for wrongdoing, despite extensive investigative efforts backed by documentary evidence.

“But as things stand, nobody is going to account for the wrongdoing,” he stated.

“And it hurts when you spend your time, you risk your life and do all of these things. This is just one of the many instances where I have done work with evidence, and it ended up nowhere.”

The award-winning journalist, whose investigations have uncovered several high-profile corruption and governance issues over the years, suggested that outcomes such as the MASLOC case could discourage journalists committed to exposing wrongdoing in the public interest.

ALSO:

Two killed, 10 injured in Dompoase crash on Cape Coast–Takoradi Highway

Nana B’s criticism of Sedina Tamakloe acquittal is politically motivated –…

According to him, the NPP’s National Organiser, Henry Nana Boakye, popularly known as Nana B, is under pressure from the party’s grassroots following the NPP’s defeat in the 2024 general election and is using the issue to regain political relevance ahead of the party’s internal elections.

Speaking on Asempa FM’s Ekosii Sen, Mr Tamakloe said Ghana is governed by the rule of law and not by the wishes of individuals.

“I think we have gotten to a point where we all understand that we have subscribed to the rule of law, not the rule of men or based on one’s wishes,” he said.

He claimed Nana B’s recent press conference was driven by internal political considerations rather than legal concerns.

“Obviously Nana B has a major election ahead of him, and the people he is competing with make it difficult for him. So he wants issues that will make him desirable among the delegates of the NPP. However, according to the delegates, he led them through one of the worst electoral defeats for the NPP. That is why he is putting himself into this judgment to remain relevant,” he stated.

Mr Tamakloe defended the Court of Appeal’s ruling, saying criminal appeals are governed by law and that the appellate judges had properly explained the legal basis for their decision.

“Criminal appeal is a creature of statute that gives you the appropriate approach to appeal against a judgment. The justices of the Court of Appeal have laid the law bare for everyone,” he said.

While acknowledging that Nana B had the right to disagree with the judgment, Mr Tamakloe argued that his criticisms lacked legal merit.

“It is okay for Nana B to criticise the judgment; that is what democracy is about. But in criticising it, you need to ask yourself the merit and basis of your criticism. I have listened to him and I don’t see why he is trying to draw the government into this issue. There is no basis for Nana B’s claim. I don’t even know why he involved government in the matter,” he added.

His comments come after the NPP described the Court of Appeal’s decision to acquit and discharge Sedina Tamakloe-Attionu as politically motivated, alleging that the ruling formed part of a broader scheme to overturn corruption-related convictions involving former NDC officials.

Addressing a press conference on Friday, July 31, Nana B argued that the acquittal was not based on the merits of the appeal despite what he described as overwhelming evidence that had led to the former MASLOC CEO’s conviction by the High Court on charges including stealing, causing financial loss to the state, money laundering and breaches of the Public Procurement Act.

READ ALSO:

NPP announces nationwide protest over tribunal law, Sedina Tamakloe ruling

John Boadu to begin nationwide tour as NPP national chairman hopeful

Addressing the media, the Ranking Member of the Lands and Natural Resources Committee and Member of Parliament for Mampong, Kwaku Ampratwum-Sarpong, said the Minority supports responsible mining, investment and increased participation of indigenous Ghanaian companies in the sector.

However, he said the caucus would resist any attempt to undermine constitutional safeguards governing the exploitation of Ghana’s mineral resources.

“The resources beneath our soil do not belong to today’s government. They do not belong to any minister. They do not belong to any political party. And they do not belong to any mining company. They belong to the Republic of Ghana,” he stated.

Mr Ampratwum-Sarpong stressed that although the Executive holds Ghana’s mineral resources in trust on behalf of the people, Parliament has a constitutional responsibility to safeguard that trust through proper scrutiny of mining agreements.

He criticised what he described as a growing practice of treating Parliament as a “conveyor belt” for approving mining leases, regardless of the quality of documentation submitted or unresolved constitutional concerns.

“The Minority rejects the growing tendency to treat Parliament as a conveyor belt for the approval of mining leases, regardless of the quality of the documentation presented or the constitutional questions that remain unanswered,” he said.

According to the Minority, Ghana’s mineral resources must not be managed in a manner that compromises the interests of the state and its citizens.

The comments follow Parliament’s ratification of six mining leases on Wednesday, July 30, 2026, involving companies including Golden Star Wassa Ltd, Maripoma Mining Services Ltd, Persians Mining Ltd and Damang Gold Ltd.

The Minority also issued a warning to mining companies operating in Ghana to comply strictly with the Constitution, the Minerals and Mining Act, and all other regulatory requirements.

“We wish to send a clear message to every mining company operating in Ghana: respect the Constitution and the laws of Ghana. The law of Ghana is not negotiable,” Mr Ampratwum-Sarpong stated.

He accused some mining companies of engaging in practices that appear to disregard constitutional and statutory obligations, including instances where mining activities allegedly commenced before parliamentary ratification and where legal and regulatory gaps had not been addressed.

The Mampong MP said the Minority was documenting all such breaches and would pursue accountability at the appropriate time.

He described Ghana’s mineral wealth as a “sacred trust” belonging to the people and insisted that all stakeholders must protect the country’s natural resources for future generations.

READ ALSO:

Supreme Court’s ruling on OSP prosecutorial powers is ‘very sound’ – Lawyer

NPP announces nationwide protest over tribunal law, Sedina Tamakloe ruling

Addressing a press conference in Accra on Friday, July 31, the party’s National Organiser, Henry Nana Boakye, popularly known as Nana B, said the protest would bring together political parties, civil society organisations, professional bodies, youth and student groups, as well as other citizens.

According to him, the demonstration is intended to draw attention to what the NPP believes are actions by the government that undermine democratic governance and the independence of state institutions.

“The time for silence is over. The NPP serves notice that on August 6, 2026, in collaboration with other political parties, CSOs, professional bodies, youth movements, student movements and all well-meaning citizens, we shall embark on a massive demonstration to defend our democracy,” Nana B said.

He stated that the protest would begin in Accra and be replicated across other regions of the country.

“This is to defend our democracy, our Constitution and the rule of law,” he added.

The announcement follows the Court of Appeal’s decision to acquit and discharge former Chief Executive Officer of the Microfinance and Small Loans Centre (MASLOC), Sedina Tamakloe-Attionu, overturning her earlier conviction by the High Court.

The NPP has criticised the Attorney General’s handling of the appeal, alleging that the state failed to defend the High Court’s judgment adequately.

According to the party, the outcome of the case raises concerns about the government’s commitment to the fight against corruption and the protection of democratic institutions.

Sedina Tamakloe Attionu was convicted by the High Court in April 2024 following a trial that began in January 2019. She was sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment after being found guilty on multiple offences linked to her tenure as MASLOC Chief Executive.

She faced 78 charges, including stealing, conspiracy to steal, wilfully causing financial loss to the state, causing loss to public property, improper payment of public funds, unauthorised commitment and money laundering.

READ ALSO:

John Boadu to begin nationwide tour as NPP national chairman hopeful

NPP urges Ghanaians to reject reintroduction of tribunals

Presiding over the Council’s sitting on Thursday, July 30, 2026, at the Manhyia Palace, Otumfuo reviewed petitions submitted by the Regional Police Command concerning reported acts of violence involving some chiefs.

Following the review, the Council Registrar was instructed to set dates for the affected parties to appear before the Council and respond to the issues raised.

The Council also referred disputes involving Buoho-Ankaase and Boaman-Maase to committees for further consideration and recommendations.

In another development, the Council witnessed the invocation of the Great Oath on behalf of Adumakaasekese as part of efforts to defend his claim to royal status.

Meanwhile, after considering a committee report on a separate traditional matter, the Kumasi Traditional Council ruled that Nana Kusiwaa Mensah II, Baapanin of Praso, is not of royal lineage.

The decisions form part of the Council’s ongoing role in resolving chieftaincy disputes and maintaining order within the traditional jurisdiction.

In a statement issued on Friday, July 31, the Communication Directorate of his campaign announced that the tour will begin in the Oti Region before extending to the northern sector of the country.

According to the statement, Mr. Boadu will engage Regional Executives, Constituency Executives, party wings, TESCON members and the media during the tour.

The engagements are expected to provide an opportunity for the former NPP General Secretary to congratulate the party’s newly elected constituency executives, listen to their concerns and outline his vision and strategic plans for rebuilding the party ahead of the 2028 general elections.

The statement said Mr. Boadu will emphasise the need for unity, discipline, reconciliation and grassroots mobilisation as the NPP prepares to reclaim power.

He is also expected to urge party members to rally behind the party’s 2028 presidential candidate, Dr. Mahamudu Bawumia, to secure victory in the next general election and win a parliamentary majority.

According to the campaign team, Mr. Boadu believes that a united and revitalised NPP is critical to returning the party to government and implementing policies that will promote Ghana’s development through freedom and justice.

The statement further encouraged constituency executives and party faithful across the country to actively participate in the engagements as the campaign gathers momentum ahead of the party’s internal elections.

READ ALSO:

‘I may die anytime, but I fear for Ghana’s future’ – NPP’s Obiri Boahen [Listen]

Why I pray Bawumia becomes Ghana’s President – Obiri Boahen [Audio]

Speaking at a press conference in Accra on Friday, July 31, Mr. Boakye, popularly known as Nana B, alleged that the reintroduction of tribunals could be used to undermine justice.

“The courts are doing their work. We know what tribunals bring to mind. The NDC intends to perpetuate evil with the tribunals,” he said.

His remarks come after Parliament passed the Tribunals Bill, 2026, which seeks to establish a reformed tribunal system to operate alongside Ghana’s existing courts.

The legislation is intended to strengthen access to justice and implement Article 126 of the 1992 Constitution, which provides for the establishment of tribunals as part of the country’s judicial system.

The NPP’s position follows concerns previously raised by Minority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin during parliamentary deliberations on the bill.

Mr. Afenyo-Markin argued that provisions establishing district and regional tribunals should be removed, warning that they could create a parallel justice system and weaken the authority of the conventional courts.

Nana B maintained that the existing courts are capable of administering justice and cautioned against creating additional judicial structures that, in his view, could be susceptible to abuse.

The government, however, has defended the legislation, stating that the reformed tribunal system will operate within the framework of the Constitution and will be subject to judicial oversight, due process safeguards and protections for fundamental human rights.

READ ALSO:

‘I may die anytime, but I fear for Ghana’s future’ – NPP’s Obiri Boahen [Listen]

Why I pray Bawumia becomes Ghana’s President – Obiri Boahen [Audio]

Speaking in an interview on Adom FM’s morning show, Dwaso Nsem, Mr Boahen said he fears for the country’s future despite its abundant natural and human resources.

“I always say that I am more than 60 years old, and at any moment I may go into my grave. But when I look at the things happening in this country, I weep for Ghana because the future looks bleak,” he said.

According to him, both the National Democratic Congress (NDC) and the New Patriotic Party (NPP) have failed to fully deliver on the promises they made to Ghanaians.

“When I compare what the NDC promised and what the NPP promised, and I look at what some of their leaders have done in this country, I become very worried,” he stated.

Mr Boahen stressed that his criticism was not directed at one political party, insisting that it would be dishonest to pretend only one side was responsible for Ghana’s challenges.

“It will be dishonest on my part to say that because I am an NPP member, my party has done nothing wrong. No. We must be honest with ourselves,” he said.

Reflecting on Ghana’s history, he lamented that the country’s enormous potential had not translated into the level of development many citizens had hoped for.

“When we gained independence, we had the resources, brilliant intellectuals, and strong institutions. We had every opportunity to become a prosperous nation, but look at where we are today,” he lamented.

Mr Boahen criticised successive governments for failing to address corruption and improve public services.

“The NPP comes to power and leaves. The NDC comes to power and leaves. We keep rotating governments, yet corruption continues, public funds are stolen, our roads remain in poor condition and hospitals still lack essential medicines,” he said.

He warned that unless Ghana’s political leadership changes its approach to governance and accountability, the country’s future would remain uncertain.

“All these things make me weep for Ghana because the future is bleak,” he said.

Reiterating his concerns, Mr Boahen added, “I am over 60 years old and I can go to my grave any day, but I worry about the kind of country we are leaving behind for the next generation.”

ALSO:

• Dzorwulu–Accra Mall accident: Pupil dies while on admission at hospital

• Kristo Asafo Mission distances itself from alleged burial rites, calls for enforcement of court injunction

• High Court rules on missing gold in Sesi-Edem and JG Resources…

Speaking in an interview on Adom FM’s morning show, Dwaso Nsem, Mr Boahen said he had anticipated the outcome following Madam Tamakloe Attionu’s extradition to Ghana.

“I said it already. I knew that once she was extradited, she would either be granted bail pending the appeal or the appeal would be expedited and she would be discharged. So I am not shocked by her acquittal,” he said.

According to him, the ruling should not come as a surprise because there have been several instances where high-profile individuals facing criminal cases have been acquitted by the courts.

“We have seen high-profile cases where people have been acquitted. Some have even gone on to hold ministerial positions after being discharged. So why should this one be surprising? It is not surprising at all,” he stated.

However, Mr Boahen noted that the development raises important legal and governance issues.

“But you know, it is quite serious,” he added, without elaborating further.

His comments follow the Court of Appeal’s unanimous decision on Thursday, July 30, 2026, to acquit and discharge Madam Tamakloe Attionu, setting aside her earlier conviction and 10-year prison sentence.

In its 94-page judgment, the three-member panel held that the trial judge lost sight of the constitutional principle that an accused person is presumed innocent until proven guilty. The court further ruled that the prosecution failed to prove the charges against the former MASLOC CEO beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellate court also criticised the manner in which the prosecution conducted the case, concluding that the evidence presented did not justify the conviction.

RELATED STORIES:

Sedina Tamakloe is my friend, but this is about accountability – A-G defends appeal…

Court of Appeal erred in acquitting Sedina Tamakloe – Former Deputy Attorney General

NPP demands withdrawal of cases against former appointees after Sedina Tamakloe acquittal

Speaking in an interview on Adom FM’s morning show, Dwaso Nsem, Mr Boahen said his support for Dr Bawumia was not based solely on party affiliation but on his personal assessment of his character and leadership qualities.

“I am a staunch member of the NPP, and my only prayer in this world is that Dr Bawumia becomes President of Ghana. It is not because I am an NPP member, but because I see him as a God-fearing person who can put the odds together,” he said.

Touching on illegal mining, popularly known as galamsey, Mr Boahen said he does not believe banning the activity completely is the best solution.

According to him, government should rather focus on regulating small-scale mining and providing the necessary documentation for operators to work legally.

“During the 2024 elections, galamsey was one of the major issues we campaigned on. I said there was no way we could completely ban it. Instead, we should give them documents to regularise their activities so they can also make a living,” he stated.

Mr Boahen argued that large-scale mining companies also benefit from government support, while the state receives limited returns from their operations.

He questioned why young people engaged in small-scale mining to support themselves should be treated differently.

“Large mining companies come in, and government receives only about 10 percent from them. They use our roads, destroy them with their trucks, yet government is left to fix those roads. Meanwhile, when young people are mining to feed themselves, we turn around to attack them,” he said.

The lawyer also expressed disappointment in some Ghanaian leaders since independence, comparing Ghana’s development trajectory with countries such as Malaysia.

“Some of our leaders from independence until today have disappointed us. Jerry Rawlings ruled for 18 years when Malaysia was nowhere near where it is today, but look at Malaysia now,” he noted.

Mr Boahen, however, acknowledged the contributions of some former presidents, mentioning former President John Agyekum Kufuor’s introduction of the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) and former President Nana Akufo-Addo’s Free Senior High School (Free SHS) policy.

“President Kufuor gave us NHIS, Akufo-Addo gave us Free SHS, and when Mahama came to power, there was supposed to be free tertiary education” he said.

Mr Boahen said he speaks with sadness when reflecting on Ghana’s future and what legacy the current generation will leave behind.

“I talk with sadness because very soon I will leave this world, and when we are gone, what will we say our mission on earth was? Sometimes, I see no hope,” he added.

READ ALSO:

• Justin Frimpong Kodua secures endorsement from Upper West NPP executives ahead…

• Martin Adjei-Mensah Korsah criticises government’s proposed MMDCE election modalities

In a Facebook post on Friday, Mr Korsah criticised the proposal for political authorities to nominate five candidates, from whom three would be shortlisted to contest the election.

He described the arrangement as inconsistent with the idea of a competitive and non-partisan local governance system.

“How can it be called a competitive national election when it potentially excludes your political opponents?” he questioned.

According to the former minister, the proposed model could prevent individuals who are not members of the governing party or do not share its political views from participating in the process.

“At least an outright partisan sponsorship by political parties would have guaranteed opportunity for all sides of the political divide to participate in the elections, with whatever the outcome, to deepen our decentralisation and democracy,” he stated.

He added that the current proposal could “exclude other Ghanaians who do not share in the NDC party and government’s beliefs or are not card-bearing members from being nominated.”

Mr Korsah argued that many Ghanaians expected the reforms to introduce a truly independent system for electing MMDCEs rather than one that continues to give political authorities control over the selection of candidates.

“Ghanaians had wished for a true and proper independent election without having to shortlist three party people and vote from,” he said.

He maintained that the proposed system does not represent a significant change from the existing arrangement, where MMDCEs are appointed by the President with approval from their respective assemblies.

“In principle and substance, it is no different from the status quo that we seek to depart from as a country,” he stated.

Mr Korsah, who served under the previous New Patriotic Party (NPP) administration, said a future NPP government would review the framework if the party returns to power.

“The next NPP government from 2029 would restore a true and proper concept of an election of MMDCEs in our country,” he added.

READ:

Sedina Tamakloe’s appeal took over two years – Lawyer (Audio)

Obiri Boahen punches holes into gov’t’s position on Constitutional Review Committee’s…

His comments follow the government’s acceptance of some recommendations from the Constitutional Review Committee (CRC), including proposals to amend aspects of the 1992 Constitution.

Speaking on Adom FM’s Dwaso Nsem, Nana Obiri Boahen questioned the practical benefits of adding an extra year to the presidential mandate, arguing that the country’s focus should rather be on strengthening local governance systems.

“Sedina Tamakloe has been freed, and we are busily trying to review the Constitution to increase the presidential term limit to five years. What is the essence of this? Of what importance is it to us?” he asked.

He wondered what significant difference an additional year would make when governments have struggled to achieve major results within the existing four-year term.

“What are they even able to do within four years? How much more five years? What difference will that make?” he questioned.

According to him, Ghana’s development challenges cannot be addressed simply by extending the tenure of presidents, but through stronger institutions and effective governance at the local level.

Nana Obiri Boahen called for the election of Metropolitan, Municipal and District Chief Executives (MMDCEs), arguing that allowing citizens to choose their local leaders would improve accountability and empower local assemblies.

“We want to elect MMDCEs. We will choose three people to contest. We must empower the assemblies to work on their own,” he stated.

He stressed that leadership at the local level should be based on competence and the ability to serve communities rather than political party affiliation.

Citing an example from the Bono Region, he said some individuals continue to win local elections because of their credibility and commitment to their communities despite their political backgrounds.

“When you go to Sunyani-Domase, there is this assembly woman who is an NDC Women’s Organiser, but even though the area is an NPP stronghold, she always wins an election because she is good material,” he said.

He also cited the current Sunyani West Municipal Chief Executive as an example of how effective local leadership can transcend party lines.

“Even the current Sunyani West MCE, even if NPP wins power and he contests as MCE, everybody will vote for him because he is also a good material,” he added.

The former NPP executive argued that Ghana’s development agenda must begin from communities rather than being driven solely by decisions made at the national level.

“We don’t develop the country from the top but from the bottom to the top,” Nana Obiri Boahen stated.

He called for constitutional reforms that prioritise stronger local governance and greater participation of citizens in choosing leaders who directly impact their communities.

Also read:

• Ken Ofori-Atta ‘toa so’; live free, live forever – Franklin Cudjoe…

• Gov’t accepts five-year presidential term, age limit cut to 35

His comments follow the government’s acceptance of a recommendation by the Constitutional Review Committee (CRC) to extend the tenure of the President and Members of Parliament from four years to five.

Attorney-General and Minister for Justice, Dr Dominic Ayine, said the proposal was aimed at giving governments more time to implement policies and development programmes, as the current four-year cycle was considered too short.

However, speaking on JoyNews’ AM Show on Friday, July 31, Prof. Boadi said he disagreed with the extension of the presidential term, warning that it could leave the country stuck with an ineffective government for a longer period.

He said he had no concerns about proposals regarding the age limit for presidential candidates, arguing that competence should not be determined solely by age.

“If you look at the age limit, you can have someone who is grown and able to reason well. You can also have a young person who is very sharp and capable. So I don’t have an issue with the age bracket,” he said.

But on the proposed five-year tenure, Prof. Boadi was emphatic.

“My issue is the five-year term,” he stated.

He questioned the argument that extending the tenure would give governments enough time to focus on development, explaining that political activities in Ghana begin almost immediately after elections.

“The argument is that governments spend about six months appointing officials and another year preparing for elections, leaving only about two years for active administration. But in Ghana, right after elections, politics starts again. Election issues begin almost immediately,” he said.

Prof. Boadi also raised concerns about the consequences of extending the period citizens must wait before changing a government that fails to deliver.

“I don’t understand this whole discussion. Imagine getting a president who is not performing, or a corrupt president, or someone sleeping on the job, and the country has to wait five years before voting again. We would be finished,” he cautioned.

He argued that Ghana’s governance challenges require stronger accountability systems rather than longer political terms.

The IERPP Executive Director further questioned whether the proposed amendment would require a national referendum, noting that some constitutional provisions can only be amended through approval by voters.

Dr Ayine has indicated that the government will establish an implementation committee to categorise the CRC recommendations based on the constitutional processes required for their adoption.

Prof. Boadi said legal experts would have to determine whether the proposed extension of the presidential and parliamentary terms falls under the entrenched provisions of the 1992 Constitution.

“My understanding is that the proposals have been grouped into categories, including those that require a referendum. The lawyers will have to confirm whether this proposal is one of them,” he said.

READ:

Justin Frimpong Kodua secures endorsement from Upper West NPP executives ahead…

Martin Adjei-Mensah Korsah criticises government’s proposed MMDCE election modalities

In a Facebook post on Friday, Mr Kodua expressed appreciation to regional party executives, the Council of Elders and Patrons for what he described as their confidence in his leadership and efforts towards strengthening the party’s structures.

He said the endorsement was not only a personal show of support but also represented a vote for continuity, stability and victory for the NPP.

According to him, his engagement with party stakeholders in the region was aimed at seeking their blessings and gathering their views on the future direction of the party.

Mr Kodua said his campaign is focused on rebuilding the NPP and positioning it for future electoral success.

“Our message is clear: PREPARED. WELL-POSITIONED. FOCUSED. REBUILD,” he stated.

He added that he accepts the confidence of the Upper West Region with humility as the party prepares for its next phase.

READ:

Martin Adjei-Mensah Korsah criticises government’s proposed MMDCE election modalities

Freddie Blay questions feasibility of all-member voting in party primaries

In a Facebook post on Friday, Mr Korsah expressed disappointment over the proposal that political authorities would nominate five candidates, from whom three would be shortlisted to contest an election.

He argued that the process would continue to give political parties influence over the selection of MMDCEs rather than introducing a truly independent local-level election system.

According to him, allowing politically backed candidates to compete after being shortlisted does not represent a significant departure from the current arrangement the reforms seek to change.

“Ghanaians had wished for a true and proper independent election without having to shortlist three party people and vote from,” Mr Korsah stated.

He added that the proposed model “in principle and substance is no different from the status quo that we seek to depart from as a country.”

The former minister, who served under the previous New Patriotic Party (NPP) administration, said a future NPP government would revisit the process and establish what he described as a genuine system for electing MMDCEs.

“The next NPP government from 2029 would restore a true and proper concept of an election of MMDCEs in our country,” he said.

They threatened to cut our heads — Atronie chief alleges threats from galamsey landguards…

Galamsey: We need action, not just inspections — Atronie chief on polluted River [Audio]

His comments follow a Supreme Court decision that declared the delegate system unconstitutional and directed political parties to adopt a more inclusive system that allows all eligible members to participate in the selection of parliamentary and presidential candidates.

The proposal has also received support from the government in principle as part of ongoing constitutional review discussions.

However, Mr Blay argued that while political parties must promote democratic values, decisions on their internal electoral structures should be guided by practical realities and a proper understanding of party organisation.

Speaking in an interview on Channel One TV, he questioned whether expanding participation to all registered party members would address concerns over corruption and undue influence in internal elections.

He cited previous reforms by the National Democratic Congress (NDC), which he said broadened participation but did not completely eliminate allegations of vote-buying and manipulation.

Mr Blay further warned that allowing all party members to participate in primaries could expose the process to interference from individuals who do not genuinely support the party.

He also highlighted the financial and logistical challenges involved in organising nationwide internal elections involving thousands of party members.

“Gathering people, bringing them together, printing ballot papers, convening them to vote, it involves resources,” he said.

He added that expanding the system would not necessarily prevent corruption or what he described as undue influence during party elections.

Mr Blay maintained that reforms aimed at strengthening internal party democracy are necessary, but insisted that any changes must consider the practical challenges political parties face in managing large-scale electoral processes.

READ:

Gov’t accepts recommendation for presidential election to be held in November

Gov’t backs constitutional amendment to allow dual citizens contest parliamentary elections

Presenting the government’s response on the Constitutional Review Committee (CRC) recommendations on Thursday, July 30, 2026, Dr Ayine explained that the change is meant to give the country’s electoral calendar greater certainty and create a longer interval between the declaration of results and the inauguration of a new president.

“We have also accepted that the presidential election be held on a day in the first week of November as the Electoral Commission may specify by constitutional instrument,” he said.

According to the Attorney General, placing the election within a fixed period would improve planning for the Electoral Commission, political parties and election observers, while also guaranteeing enough time for a proper transition before the January 7 inauguration.

“A fixed period gives certainty to the electoral calendar. It allows the Commission, the parties and observers to plan and it ensures an adequate interval between the election and the inauguration of the incoming president on January 7.”

As part of the same set of electoral reforms, the government has accepted proposals to introduce clear constitutional timelines for the hearing of presidential election petitions.

Under the planned amendments, any petition challenging the outcome of a presidential election must be filed within 14 days of the declaration of results and must be determined by the Supreme Court within 30 days.

“The government has accepted that a petition must be filed within 14 days of the declaration of results and determined by the Supreme Court within 30 days.”

Dr Ayine further stated that the proposed changes would impose a constitutional duty on the Electoral Commission to release all relevant election data to the courts and to the parties involved in any dispute.

“There is going to be a constitutional obligation on the part of the Electoral Commission to disclose all relevant data to the courts and to all the parties.”

He emphasised that the reforms are designed to ensure election disputes are resolved promptly and to protect the stability of Ghana’s democratic transitions.

“We take this position because the timely resolution of election disputes endures well to the stability of our democratic transitions and to the general political stability of our country and society.”

The proposals form part of the government’s White Paper on the Constitutional Review Committee’s recommendations and will require constitutional amendments before they can take effect.

Also read:

• Why EC can not hold elections in November – Omane Boamah reveals

• SDA Church welcomes future election date change to November

• Mahama rejects EC’s proposal for elections to be held on November 7

Attorney-General and Minister for Justice, Dominic Ayine, announced the decision during a press briefing on government’s position on the final recommendations of the Constitutional Review Committee.

According to him, the current constitutional restriction does not reflect the realities of modern citizenship or Ghana’s relationship with its diaspora community.

“The current disqualification sits uneasily with our engagement with the diaspora and with the realities of modern citizenship,” he said.

Under the proposed amendment, a Ghanaian citizen by birth who holds citizenship of another country will not be required to give up that citizenship before seeking election to Parliament.

The Attorney-General explained that the reform is intended to broaden political participation and ensure that qualified Ghanaians are not excluded from public service because of their dual citizenship status.

He further disclosed that multiple citizenship would no longer disqualify individuals from holding certain public offices, except the positions of President and Vice President.

“Except that of President and Vice President of the Republic,” he stated.

Mr. Ayine added that dual citizens could, under the proposed changes, qualify to occupy positions such as Chief Justice, head of the Electoral Commission and Speaker of Parliament.

“Multiple citizenship will not disqualify a person from becoming Chief Justice of the Republic, becoming the head of the Electoral Commission, or becoming Speaker of Parliament,” he said.

However, he clarified that the restriction on dual or multiple citizenship would remain for the offices of President and Vice President.

The Attorney-General said the proposed reforms form part of government’s broader efforts to review constitutional provisions and ensure they reflect Ghana’s current social, political and economic realities.

Supreme Court ruling on delegate system socially discriminatory – Local Gov’t…

NPP to announce next steps after Sedina Tamakloe-Attionu’s acquittal

Attorney-General and Minister for Justice, Dr. Dominic Ayine, announced the proposal while presenting government’s White Paper on the recommendations of the Constitutional Review Committee on Thursday, July 30.

The proposed reform is part of measures aimed at strengthening Ghana’s democratic institutions, improving governance and making Parliament more inclusive.

Dr. Ayine explained that the current constituency-based electoral system will be maintained, with an additional proportional representation component introduced to increase the participation of groups that have historically been underrepresented in Parliament.

Under the proposal, 276 MPs will continue to be elected through the existing constituency elections, while the remaining 24 seats will be allocated through a proportional representation system.

The additional seats will be reserved for groups including women, persons with disabilities (PWDs) and young people.

“The government has accepted that the size of Parliament be capped and we propose a ceiling of 300 members. The current membership of Parliament is 276 and so these will be elected directly in constituency elections like we already have, and the remaining 24 will be elected or selected through proportional representation among women, persons with disabilities and the youth,” he said.

The Attorney-General disclosed that an independent study will be commissioned to determine the structure and implementation of the proportional representation component.

He said the proposed cap would help reduce the cost of running Parliament while creating opportunities for broader representation.

“Capping Parliament saves cost and the reserve element opens the doors of our legislature wider to those that our politics have historically kept outside,” Dr. Ayine stated.

ALSO:

DVLA CEO cuts sod for construction of office at Bechem

NPP to announce next steps after Sedina Tamakloe-Attionu’s acquittal

In a statement issued on Thursday, July 30, and signed by the party’s General Secretary, Justin Kodua Frimpong, the NPP described the appellate court’s decision as “a travesty of justice” and alleged that it reflected what it called a politically motivated justice system.

The party said it was “shocked and dismayed” by the ruling, which overturned the conviction of Madam Tamakloe Attionu, who had been sentenced by the High Court in April 2024 to 10 years’ imprisonment after being found guilty of offences including stealing, causing financial loss to the state, money laundering and breaches of the Public Procurement Act.

According to the NPP, the former MASLOC CEO was prosecuted over a five-year period, during which the trial court found that her actions between 2013 and 2016 had caused a financial loss of nearly GH¢90 million to the state.

The statement further claimed that Madam Tamakloe Attionu fled Ghana while the trial was ongoing, was convicted in absentia and was later extradited from the United States to Ghana on June 9, 2026.

The party argued that the High Court judgment was based on substantial evidence, including findings relating to fraudulent disbursements, unaccounted-for funds and alleged diversion of MASLOC resources.

It questioned how such a conviction could be overturned, describing the decision as inconsistent with the evidence presented during the trial.

The NPP further alleged that the acquittal was politically motivated and accused the Attorney-General of selectively handling criminal prosecutions since January 2025.

According to the party, the ruling fits what it described as a pattern in which cases involving individuals associated with the governing National Democratic Congress (NDC) have either been discontinued or terminated.

The opposition party argued that the latest development undermines public confidence in the justice system and weakens efforts to protect the public purse.

As part of its demands, the NPP called on the Attorney-General to immediately discontinue all criminal cases involving former appointees of the previous administration if the same standards are to be applied.

The party also demanded the acquittal and discharge of its Ashanti Regional Chairman, Bernard Antwi Boasiako, popularly known as Chairman Wontumi, arguing that his conviction and 20-year prison sentence were politically motivated and are currently the subject of an appeal.

Additionally, the NPP called on the Attorney-General to publicly account for all criminal cases involving persons affiliated with the governing party that have been withdrawn, discontinued or otherwise terminated since January 2025.

The party also urged the Judicial Council and the leadership of the Judiciary to take steps to restore public confidence in the administration of justice.

The NPP said it would pursue all lawful legal avenues, including seeking a review of the Court of Appeal’s decision at the Supreme Court where applicable, insisting that the fight against corruption must be impartial and not influenced by political considerations.

READ ALSO:

NPP to announce next steps after Sedina Tamakloe-Attionu’s acquittal

‘This is well-choreographed antics by NDC to free Sedina Tamakloe’ — Nana Boakye

His clarification follows the Attorney-General and Minister for Justice, Dr Dominic Ayine’s announcement that the government has accepted a recommendation by the Constitutional Review Committee (CRC) to extend the tenure of both the President and Members of Parliament from four to five years.

In a post on X, formerly Twitter, Mr Kwakye Ofosu sought to dispel speculation that the proposed amendment could benefit the current President.

“Attorney-General says Government accepts recommendation of Constitutional Review Committee to extend presidential term from 4 to 5 years. Minimum eligible age to contest for president reduced to 35 from 40. For the avoidance of doubt, this proposed amendment does not apply to the incumbent President,” he wrote.

Presenting the government’s White Paper on the Constitutional Review Committee’s recommendations, Dr Ayine said the proposal is intended to provide future administrations with a longer period to implement their policies and programmes before returning to the electorate.

According to the Attorney-General, the existing four-year electoral cycle leaves governments with limited time to effectively execute their development agenda, as transition processes and election-related activities often dominate the beginning and end of every administration.

He argued that extending the tenure to five years would provide a more practical timeframe for governance, policy implementation and the assessment of government performance.

The government also accepted another recommendation to lower the minimum age required to run for president from 40 to 35 years.

The proposed constitutional amendments are expected to undergo the required legislative and constitutional processes before they can take effect.

Attorney-General says Government accepts recommendation of Constitutional Review Committee to extend presidential term from 4 to 5 years.

Minimum eligible age to contest for president reduced to 35 from 40.

For the avoidance of doubt, this proposed ammendment does not apply…

— Felix Kwakye Ofosu (@FelixKwakyeOfo1) July 30, 2026

READ ALSO:

Judiciary to roll out electronic court processes from October – Chief Justice

DVLA CEO cuts sod for construction of office at Bechem

In a Facebook post by the party’s General Secretary, Justin Frimpong Kodua, the NPP said it has been closely monitoring developments in the case and expressed surprise at the appellate court’s ruling.

“The New Patriotic Party has followed with keen interest the rather shocking ruling of the Court of Appeal in the matter involving former MASLOC CEO, Madam Sedina Tamakloe-Attionu,” the statement said.

The party explained that it is currently engaging its internal structures and will communicate its position after consultations.

“The Party will, in due course, communicate its official position on the ruling and announce the appropriate steps it intends to take in response to the decision,” it added.

The comments follow the Court of Appeal’s decision to overturn the conviction and 10-year prison sentence handed to Madam Tamakloe-Attionu by the High Court in 2024.

She was convicted on several charges, including causing financial loss to the state and stealing, in connection with allegations of misappropriation and diversion of MASLOC funds during her tenure as Chief Executive Officer.

However, the Court of Appeal ruled that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt and subsequently acquitted and discharged her of all charges.

The Attorney-General has since announced plans to challenge the decision at the Supreme Court.

Attorney-General to challenge Court of Appeal’s ruling in Sedina Tamakloe’s case

‘This is well-choreographed antics by NDC to free Sedina Tamakloe’ —…

However, he believes the ruling, which seeks to widen participation in political party primaries and address concerns over money politics, will not completely eliminate monetisation in internal party elections.

Speaking in an interview with JoyNews, Dr. Afriyie said the decision could help reduce bribery and undue influence but would not entirely remove the culture of money-driven politics.

“The Supreme Court’s decision is a good one, but it will only help reduce, not eradicate, bribery and corruption in the electoral system,” he said.

According to him, monetisation in party primaries has become deeply rooted over the years, making it difficult to address through electoral reforms alone.

He explained that even with a larger voter base, candidates with financial advantage could still find ways to influence voters through gifts, logistics and other forms of inducement.

“The challenge is not just about the size of the delegates. It is about the culture of money politics that has developed within our parties,” he added.

The Supreme Court, by a 5-2 majority decision, ruled that aspects of the delegate system used by political parties to elect presidential and parliamentary candidates are unconstitutional.

The court directed political parties to, within one year, replace the system with one that allows all members in good standing to participate in the selection of candidates.

The ruling has since sparked discussions on the future of political party elections and the reforms needed to make them more transparent and inclusive.

Dr. Afriyie, however, raised concerns about the practical challenges associated with implementing the new system.

He argued that allowing all eligible party members to vote could create significant financial and logistical demands for political parties, candidates and organisers.

He also questioned how parties would determine members who qualify to participate, noting that the responsibility now rests with the political parties.

“Now it is up to the political party to determine who its members in good standing are, and that will largely depend on the fulfilment of financial obligations. The parties may also increase dues, nomination and filing fees for aspirants,” he said.

Meanwhile, some residents in Kumasi have welcomed the Supreme Court’s decision but share concerns that it may not completely end monetisation in party primaries.

They believe the ruling addresses long-standing concerns about money influencing internal elections and the disconnect between delegates and the wider party membership.

“It will cure a certain mischief,” one resident said. “First, the monetisation of our politics, and second, the situation where the general electorate feel that delegates did not elect the candidate they wanted.”

Other residents said the decision could restore confidence in party primaries and deepen democratic participation by giving all eligible party members the opportunity to vote.

They added that although implementation may come with challenges, expanding participation remains necessary to make internal party elections more credible.

READ:

How one house launched my real estate journey – Derrick Abaitey

Defective charge sheet secured my client’s freedom – Sedina Tamakloe’s lawyer..

Mr Nimako said although the full details of the court’s judgment are yet to be studied, the decision appears to be aimed at reducing the influence of money in political contests. However, he believes opening up party primaries to all eligible members may not be the solution.

“We have all not seen the full judgment and so we do not know the actual basis. But what the court is saying is that the decision is to kill monetisation. I am saying this is not the cure,” he said.

Speaking on Adom FM’s Dwaso Nsem, the NPP elections chief argued that the ruling could instead shift the financial burden of internal elections from individual aspirants to political parties.

He explained that if every card-bearing member in good standing is allowed to vote in parliamentary primaries, parties would have to organise large-scale elections involving thousands or even millions of members.

“We are saying that every card-bearing member in good standing must be allowed to vote to elect a parliamentary candidate. Let’s assume you have a membership of eight million and you have to conduct an election,” he said.

Mr Nimako questioned the cost implications of organising such elections, comparing them to the expenses incurred by the Electoral Commission (EC) in conducting national elections.

“Let’s ask the EC how much it costs to organise a national election. If this burden is being brought on the political parties, you would expect that they comply with the law, and in doing so, they must get money to conduct their internal election,” he added.

He noted that candidates would still incur expenses while campaigning among party members, even under a broader voting system.

“Who said that in doing so, you will not go round to canvas for votes among the membership? You will do that, so you bear a certain cost,” he said.

However, Mr Nimako stressed that he does not support vote buying or the practice of inducing voters, insisting that existing laws already prohibit such acts.

“I am not in support of aspirants paying for votes, but there is an existing law, the Political Parties Act, Act 574, which is against it. The law prohibits voter inducement and vote buying,” he stated.

He argued that the focus should instead be on enforcing existing laws and improving political party financing systems, rather than relying solely on changes to the internal election structure.

Mr Nimako also raised concerns about how political parties would manage their membership registers under a system where all eligible members participate in primaries.

He explained that unlike national elections, where the EC maintains the official voters’ register, political parties would have to create and manage their own databases.

“Who has the membership list? The EC has the register of eligible voters. Now that responsibility is on the party. If I am asking for enforcement, how are you going to do it? How will the party develop its membership register? Who will have it?” he questioned.

The NPP elections director further argued that delegate systems are not necessarily undemocratic, noting that several political systems around the world use similar methods in selecting candidates.

“I don’t know of any law in the world that is against the delegate system,” he said.

The Supreme Court recently directed political parties to replace the delegate-based system with one that allows all eligible party members to participate directly in parliamentary and presidential primaries within one year.

Also read:

• NPP welcomes Supreme Court ruling on delegate system, but…. – Evans Nimako

• Supreme Court ruling on delegate system strengthens Ghana’s democracy – Nyaho-Tamakloe

His comments follow the Court of Appeal’s ruling on Thursday, July 30, which overturned the conviction and 10-year prison sentence handed to Madam Tamakloe-Attionu by the High Court.

The appellate court held that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt and consequently set aside the convictions against the former MASLOC boss.

Speaking on JoyNews’ The Pulse shortly after the ruling, Nana Boakye said he was not surprised by the outcome, claiming that developments surrounding the case had pointed to a planned effort to free her.

“This was suspected. This is a well-choreographed antics by the NDC to free Sedina Tamakloe, and they have given the signs right from the beginning,” he said.

Mr Boakye questioned the circumstances surrounding Madam Tamakloe-Attionu’s extradition to Ghana, arguing that events leading to her return raised concerns.

“From the time they put in the application and the extradition, even the government, who asked that she is present in Ghana, it took authority in the state to announce to us that Sedina Tamakloe had been extradited to Ghana,” he said.

He also raised concerns about reports on her whereabouts after her return, following questions from members of the Minority in Parliament.

“The extent that now the Minority asked her whereabouts and we were told that she’s now gone for medical tests, yes, medical attention,” he added.

The NPP National Organiser further accused the Attorney-General of failing to put up a strong defence of the state’s case during the appeal.

“The Attorney General then put in a very weak, very relaxed defence at the court,” he alleged.

Mr Boakye maintained that the Court of Appeal’s decision was the result of a deliberate process aimed at freeing the former MASLOC CEO.

“This is a very weak and very relaxed defence, so this is well-choreographed just to free Sedina Tamakloe,” he added.

READ:

Court of Appeal acquits, discharges former MASLOC CEO Sedina Tamakloe-Attionu

Defective charge sheet secured my client’s freedom – Sedina Tamakloe’s lawyer…

The party’s Director of Elections, Evans Nimako, said the NPP respects the judgment and will engage its leadership to determine the best approach to comply with the directive while safeguarding the integrity of its internal electoral processes.

Speaking on Adom FM’s Dwaso Nsem, Mr Nimako said the party, as a law-abiding institution, accepts the court’s decision but needs to carefully assess its implications.

“As a law-abiding institution, coming from the court, we don’t have any option but to respect the pronouncement of the court,” he said.

His comments follow a 5-2 majority decision by the Supreme Court directing political parties to replace the delegate-based system with one that allows all eligible party members to directly participate in presidential and parliamentary primaries.

The court further ordered political parties to take the necessary steps within one year to comply with the ruling.

The decision followed a case filed by Prof. Kwabena Frimpong-Boateng, Dr Nyaho Nyaho-Tamakloe and Dr Christine Amoako-Nuamah, who argued that the delegate system restricted the participation of ordinary party members and undermined democratic principles guaranteed under the 1992 Constitution.

However, Mr Nimako raised concerns about the practical challenges of implementing the ruling within the stipulated timeframe, particularly the process of identifying eligible party members who will be entitled to vote under the new arrangement.

He questioned whether the responsibility of determining party members in good standing would rest with the Electoral Commission or the political parties.

“For us, as New Patriotic Party leadership, we’ll strategise and see how we can operate because we’ve always operated under a legal regime that enhances the continuous development of democracy,” he said.

Mr Nimako added that the party would study the full details of the judgment and consult relevant stakeholders before deciding on the next steps.

Also read:

• Supreme Court ruling exposes need for political party funding reforms – NPP

• We know NDC will fail on its promises; NPP will uproot them like mushroom…

Speaking on behalf of the committee after its inauguration, the former Member of Parliament for Suhum expressed appreciation to the party leadership for the confidence placed in the team and pledged to execute the mandate with professionalism and integrity.

Mr Opare-Ansah said the committee understands the importance of the task before it, noting that its responsibility goes beyond organising elections to protecting the democratic principles, unity and credibility of the party.

“We recognise the enormous responsibility entrusted to us. We are determined to ensure that every stage of the process is conducted with fairness, transparency, integrity and strict adherence to the Constitution and the rules governing the elections,” he said.

He urged all aspirants, party executives and members to cooperate with the committee by respecting the party’s electoral guidelines and procedures throughout the process.

Mr Opare-Ansah further disclosed that the committee would engage regularly with stakeholders to promote transparency, build confidence and address concerns that may emerge before and during the elections.

While acknowledging that internal elections are naturally competitive, he stressed the need for the process to strengthen the party rather than create divisions.

“Our objective is not merely to conduct successful elections but to leave the party stronger, more united and better positioned for the important national task ahead. Every contestant and every delegate must have confidence that the process will be impartial and that every vote will count,” he stated.

He further assured party members that the committee would operate independently and without fear or favour, adding that fairness and equal treatment for all contestants would remain the guiding principles of its work.

The National Elections Committee has been tasked with planning, organising and supervising all activities leading to the NPP’s National Conference, including conducting the election of national officers in accordance with the party’s constitution and electoral regulations.

The committee is chaired by Frederick Opare-Ansah, with Member of Parliament for Atiwa East, Abena Osei Asare, serving as Vice Chairperson, while Evans Nimako serves as Secretary. Other members include Madam Oboshie Sai Cofie, Anthony Abayifa Karbo, Salam Ama Appianin Damata, Eric Ntori, the incoming Ashanti Regional Chairman after the regional elections, and Frank Davies, Esq.

Also read:

• Ghana’s UK High Commissioner alleges NPP gov’t mismanaged scholarship funds

• Supreme Court ruling exposes need for political party funding reforms – NPP

Contributing to the debate on the 2026 Mid-Year Budget Review in Parliament on Wednesday, July 29, Mr Agbana said the opposition appeared unable to distinguish between responsible expenditure and wasteful spending because of its record in government.

According to him, the Mahama administration has adopted a different approach by exercising fiscal discipline while directing public resources to priority sectors capable of driving economic growth and improving the livelihoods of Ghanaians.

“They are so used to the culture of normalised expenditure and reckless spending to the extent that fiscal discipline appears to them as not spending,” he said.

Mr Agbana maintained that the government’s prudent management of public funds was producing positive results, citing what he described as signs of economic recovery and improved fiscal stability.

He said the administration would continue to pursue responsible fiscal policies despite criticism from the opposition, insisting that sound economic management should take precedence over politically motivated spending.

WAEC releases 2026 BECE results; cancels and withholds some results over malpractice

Fiscal discipline should not be mistaken for lack of spending –…

Speaking during the debate on the 2026 Mid-Year Budget Review in Parliament on Wednesday, July 29, the Majority MP dismissed claims by the Minority that the government had failed to inject sufficient resources into the economy, describing the assertions as misleading.

According to him, the Mahama administration has adopted a prudent approach to public spending by prioritising investments that deliver value for money while keeping the country’s finances on a sustainable path.

“It is not true that we are not spending. The only difference is that this government is spending responsibly, this government is spending prudently and this government is investing in the right places,” he said.

Mr Agbana explained that the government’s approach represents a deliberate shift away from excessive and unplanned expenditure towards strategic investments that promote economic growth.

He maintained that prudent management of public finances would help consolidate the gains made in stabilising the economy while laying the foundation for sustainable long-term development.

READ ALSO:

WAEC releases 2026 BECE results; cancels and withholds some results over malpractice

Court rejects ex-NAFCO CEO’s wife’s request to travel abroad with son…

According to the party’s Deputy General Secretary, Haruna Mohammed, political parties cannot be expected to shoulder the financial burden of expanded internal elections without adequate support, given that they are prohibited by law from operating as profit-making organisations.

Speaking on Joy FM’s Top Story, Mr Mohammed said the implementation of the Supreme Court’s decision should be accompanied by broader reforms that address the financial sustainability of political parties.

“Political parties need to be taken a critical look at,” he said.

He explained that under Ghana’s legal framework, political parties are restricted in how they generate revenue, making it difficult to finance large-scale internal electoral processes.

“If you read the Political Parties Act, no political party in Ghana has the right to do business for profit-making. It is good that we remind the law agencies, the judiciary and the people of Ghana to realise that political parties are not being funded,” he stated.

Mr Mohammed argued that while expanding participation in the selection of parliamentary and presidential candidates is a positive democratic development, the cost of organising such elections could become a major challenge if the issue of funding is left unresolved.

He noted that the NPP has already begun implementing reforms aimed at broadening participation in its internal elections, including compiling a membership database through both manual and digital registration.

According to him, the party has successfully used the register for polling station and electoral area elections, demonstrating its commitment to strengthening internal democracy.

However, he maintained that implementing the Supreme Court’s ruling on a national scale would require more than organisational preparedness.

“The issue of financing political parties must be looked at seriously because political parties are not profit-making entities,” he stressed.

Mr Mohammed’s comments come after the Supreme Court declared the delegate system used by political parties unconstitutional, a landmark decision expected to compel parties to adopt more inclusive voting systems that allow broader participation by registered members.

While political parties have largely welcomed the ruling, concerns are emerging over the financial and logistical demands of organising nationwide internal elections without a dedicated framework to support party financing.

Speaking on Asempa FM’s Ekosii Sen, Dr Nyaho-Tamakloe argued that the NPP has drifted from the democratic principles on which it was founded.

“If our party had been a party that I will call a democratic party, Bawumia would never have been even the running mate to Akufo-Addo,” he said.

According to him, clear criteria for members seeking leadership positions include being a member in good standing, paying party dues, attending at least 50 percent of branch meetings and maintaining active membership for several years before contesting internal elections.

He claimed that when Dr Bawumia was selected as running mate, those requirements had not been met.

“Based on the criteria of being a party member in good standing, paying party dues, attending more than 50 per cent of meetings at the branch level and being a member of the party for three or four years before the primary, I will say he did not qualify,” he stated.

Dr Nyaho-Tamakloe warned that political parties, particularly the NPP, must be careful not to undermine democratic values through their internal decisions.

“What is happening in the political parties now, particularly the NPP, surprises me because we were known as the mother of democracy, but that mantle has now been taken over by the NDC. At the moment, the NDC is more democratic than the NPP,” he said.

He also criticised comments made by the NPP General Secretary following the conviction of the party’s Ashanti Regional Chairman, Bernard Antwi Boasiako, popularly known as Chairman Wontumi.

Dr Nyaho-Tamakloe questioned how the party’s leadership could describe the court’s decision as politically motivated less than 24 hours after the judgment.

“How can a case that has been heard by a High Court judge, and in less than 24 hours the party’s General Secretary calls a press conference and says the sentence was politically motivated? This could never have happened under his predecessors,” he said.

His comments come at a time of heightened debate over internal democracy within the NPP, following recent controversies surrounding constituency elections and the conviction of Chairman Wontumi in an illegal mining case.

READ ALSO:

Opening party elections to all members will be expensive but necessary — NDC on Supreme Court ruling

Supreme Court declares political parties’ delegate system unconstitutional

According to him, the ruling will strengthen democratic governance by ensuring greater participation of party members in the selection of presidential and parliamentary candidates while reducing the influence of what he described as “monicracy.”

Speaking on Asempa FM’s Ekosii Sen, Dr Nyaho-Tamakloe said the judgment was a significant milestone in Ghana’s democratic development.

“It is a victory for the whole nation and, particularly to me, it is a total slap in the face of monicracy because it nearly destroyed some of the political parties,” he said.

He argued that had the Supreme Court ruled differently, Ghana’s democratic system could have faced serious challenges.

“I will also say that if this had not happened, or if the judgment had been different today, it would have been the end of democracy in this country,” he stated.

Dr Nyaho-Tamakloe maintained that allowing all qualified party members to participate in electing candidates would make it more difficult for individuals to manipulate internal elections.

He dismissed concerns that expanding participation in internal elections would create financial or logistical difficulties for political parties.

“If people try to influence others’ votes, that party will be exposed. That party will also become an enemy of democracy and the good people of this country,” he said.

“I don’t see the financial aspect or logistics concerns during internal elections as a problem. The Supreme Court ruling today marks a significant turning point in Ghana’s democratic journey,” he added.

The Supreme Court, in a 5-2 majority decision, ruled that the delegate system used by political parties to elect presidential and parliamentary candidates is unconstitutional.

The court directed political parties to adopt a more inclusive voting system that allows all members in good standing to participate in the election of presidential and parliamentary candidates.

The ruling effectively abolishes the long-standing practice under which only selected delegates voted on behalf of the wider party membership.

Political parties have been given one year to comply with the court’s directive and implement the required reforms to their internal electoral processes.

READ ALSO:

Opening party elections to all members will be expensive but necessary — NDC on Supreme Court ruling

Supreme Court declares political parties’ delegate system unconstitutional

The party’s Deputy Director of IT and Elections, Rashid Tanko Computer, said although opening up internal elections to all party members would increase the cost of organising such exercises, the need to protect democratic principles within political parties must take precedence.

Speaking on JoyNews’ The Pulse on Wednesday, July 29, Mr Tanko said political parties would have to find innovative ways of raising funds to meet the increased cost of conducting broader elections.

“Of course, it’s going to be a costly organisation for us, the political parties, to organise such an election. But we want to defend the democratic credentials of our political parties,” he said.

His comments follow the Supreme Court’s declaration that the delegate system used by political parties to elect parliamentary and presidential candidates is unconstitutional, a decision expected to compel parties to allow wider participation by their members.

Mr Tanko said the NDC accepts the authority of the apex court and will work towards complying with the ruling.

He argued that with party members gaining a direct role in selecting leaders and candidates, there would be a need to strengthen internal funding mechanisms, particularly through the payment of membership dues.

“Now that party members are going to participate fully in deciding who leads the parliamentary caucus and the presidential [candidate], it means you need to pay your dues. We have to strengthen that aspect because it is the membership dues that we will have to use to organise this,” he explained.

Mr Tanko added that the ruling presents an opportunity for parties to deepen engagement with their members by ensuring that those who have a voice in decision-making also contribute financially to sustaining party activities.

He maintained that while the transition may be expensive, it will ultimately reinforce internal democracy and improve member participation in political parties.

READ ALSO:

Supreme Court declares political parties’ delegate system unconstitutional

Barker-Vormawor calls for constitutional reforms after Supreme Court ruling on OSP powers

The new legislation consolidates existing customs laws and is expected to streamline customs procedures while aligning Ghana’s customs regime with international best practices.

It also seeks to strengthen the fight against smuggling, illicit trade and other customs-related offences by providing a more robust legal framework for customs operations.

The bill was introduced in Parliament on Thursday, July 23, 2026, by the Minister for Roads and Highways, Kwame Governs Agbodza, on behalf of the Minister for Finance, Dr Cassiel Ato Forson, in accordance with Article 106(2) of the 1992 Constitution.

It was read for the first time on the same day before being referred to Parliament’s Finance Committee for scrutiny and a report in line with Article 106(4) of the Constitution and Order 226(2) of the Standing Orders of Parliament.

Following consideration of the committee’s report, Parliament approved the bill, clearing the way for the establishment of a comprehensive legal framework to regulate customs administration in the country.

The legislation is expected to improve compliance among importers and exporters, facilitate legitimate trade, strengthen border controls and enhance the state’s capacity to mobilise revenue through a more efficient customs administration system.

The Customs Bill, 2026, will now be transmitted to President John Dramani Mahama for assent before it becomes law.

READ ALSO:

Attorney-General to brief nation on government’s position on Constitution Review Committee report Thursday

Ghana Water apologises for water supply disruptions following nationwide power outage

Reacting to the judgment, Mr Barker-Vormawor said the decision preserves the Attorney General’s constitutional authority over criminal prosecutions while providing guidance on the need to review aspects of the country’s constitutional arrangements.

“What the court has done is essentially preserve the Attorney General’s power to oversee all prosecutions,” he said.

According to him, several legal experts had argued that the Constitution limited Parliament’s ability to grant the OSP complete prosecutorial independence through legislation.

He, however, stressed that the ruling should not be interpreted as a setback to the fight against corruption but rather as an opportunity to pursue reforms that strengthen accountability institutions.

“The way forward, I think, is that the court gives us a clear direction that we need constitutional reform to fix some of the issues that have come up,” he stated.

His comments follow the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision to dismiss a constitutional challenge against provisions of the Office of the Special Prosecutor Act, 2017 (Act 959), which grant the OSP independent prosecutorial powers.

The judgment effectively affirms the legality of the OSP’s operations while maintaining the Attorney General’s constitutional role in criminal prosecutions.

The ruling is expected to allow the OSP to continue with ongoing corruption-related cases, while discussions on possible constitutional amendments to enhance the office’s independence continue.

ALSO;

High Court grants 10-day interim injunction against Apostle Safo Kantanka’s funeral

Supreme Court unanimously dismisses case challenging OSP’s prosecutorial powers

Prince Latif Oyekunle, one of the candidates contesting the Oti Regional Chairmanship position, was disqualified by the election committee.

According to information available, the decision was linked to claims that Mr Oyekunle had taken the Association to court over issues involving alleged double salary payments and the reported withdrawal of GH¢500,000.

The disqualification has sparked dissatisfaction among some members, with delegates questioning whether the decision was consistent with principles of fairness, transparency and due process.

Speaking to Adom News, Prince Latif Oyekunle expressed concerns about the development, stressing that the credibility of the election process depends not only on adherence to rules but also on ensuring that decisions affecting candidates are applied fairly and transparently.

He argued that electoral processes must provide avenues for affected candidates to seek redress before final decisions are made.

Meanwhile, concerns have also been raised about the organisation of the vetting and voting processes.

Sources indicate that candidates were vetted and voting proceeded on the same day, a situation some members believe did not provide enough time for a disqualified aspirant to challenge the decision or pursue internal remedies before the elections took place.

Some members say the arrangement has affected confidence in the fairness of the process.

The situation has been further compounded by reports that the names of the CLOGSAG Chairman and Secretary at the Oti Regional Coordinating Council (ORCC) were removed from the delegates’ list.

Although reasons for the reported removal remain unclear, the development has raised concerns among members about the integrity of the delegate register and the overall administration of the elections.

Some members have appealed to CLOGSAG’s national leadership to intervene and ensure that the process is conducted in a transparent and credible manner in line with the Association’s constitution.

They warned that unresolved concerns could affect the legitimacy of the election outcome and create divisions within the Association in the Oti Region.

READ:

NDC intensifies efforts to strengthen youth base in Ahafo ahead of…

They threatened to cut our heads — Atronie chief alleges threats…

The initiative was announced during a meeting in Goaso, where the regional youth executives engaged youth organisers from all six constituencies in the region to discuss strategies for consolidating the party’s grassroots support.

Speaking to Adom News, the Ahafo Regional Deputy Youth Organiser, Razak Ahmed, said the NDC is determined to retain power in the next general elections and believes a strong and united youth front will be critical to achieving that objective.

According to him, following the party’s recent branch elections, there is the need to foster unity by resolving any misunderstandings that may have arisen during the electoral process.

“We cannot afford to lose the next general elections. It is important that we maintain peace and unity within the party while strengthening our youth front,” he said.

Mr Ahmed noted that the youth played a decisive role in the NDC’s victory in the 2024 elections, adding that many young people were attracted to the party’s message and turned out in large numbers to support its campaign.

He said the regional youth leadership has already outlined strategies aimed at expanding and strengthening the party’s youth support base to secure another electoral victory in 2028.

Meanwhile, the Deputy Youth Organiser for Asutifi North, Patricia Oteng Agyemang, speaking on behalf of the constituency youth organisers, commended the regional executives for organising the engagement.

She described the meeting as timely, saying it would help reinforce unity and strengthen the party’s youth structures across the region.

Ms Oteng Agyemang, however, appealed to the government to intensify efforts to address youth unemployment in the Ahafo Region.

While acknowledging the government’s efforts, she said more needed to be done to create employment opportunities for the many young people who contributed to the party’s electoral success.

The engagement brought together youth organisers from the Asunafo North, Asunafo South, Asutifi North, Asutifi South, Tano North and Tano South constituencies.

READ ALSO:

Ghana Water apologises for water supply disruptions following nationwide power outage

GNFS averts major power outage after extinguishing electrical fire at Tetegu

In a 5-2 majority decision, the court ordered political parties to put in place mechanisms that will allow all members in good standing to participate in the election of presidential and parliamentary candidates.

The ruling effectively ends the long-standing practice where only selected delegates voted on behalf of the wider party membership to choose candidates for general elections.

The court gave political parties one year from the date of the judgment to comply with the directive.

The decision is expected to require parties to amend relevant provisions in their constitutions and electoral guidelines to align with the court’s interpretation of the 1992 Constitution.

The ruling could significantly transform Ghana’s internal party democracy by widening participation in the selection of candidates ahead of future elections.

Political parties will now be required to develop new electoral frameworks that allow all eligible members who meet membership requirements to vote during presidential and parliamentary primaries.

The decision is expected to have major implications for the country’s major political parties, including the National Democratic Congress (NDC) and the New Patriotic Party (NPP), which have traditionally relied on delegate conferences to elect presidential candidates and parliamentary nominees.

READ ALSO:

‘Don’t pardon Wontumi’ – NDC’s James Agbey warns Mahama of grassroots…

NPP inaugurates National Elections Committee

He warns that such a move could provoke a backlash from the party’s grassroots.

In a public statement issued on Wednesday, July 29, Mr Agbey said recent appeals for presidential mercy were premature and should not influence the legal process.

His comments come after Wontumi’s spokesperson, Dr Palgrave Boakye-Danquah, publicly appealed to President Mahama to forgive the embattled NPP chairman over remarks made against the President and his family during the 2024 election campaign.

“I want to make an appeal and apologise to President Mahama if, at any stage, Wontumi went too far in the making of statements about his wife and children leading up to the 2024 elections. I ask him to show mercy and forgiveness,” Dr Boakye-Danquah told Joy News.

Mr Agbey dismissed the ongoing campaign for clemency, describing it as “complete tittle-tattle.”

According to him, Wontumi has “not even served a fraction of his time” and should not yet be the subject of discussions about a presidential pardon.

He argued that while Wontumi could become eligible for clemency in the future, now was not the appropriate time, especially when, in his view, the New Patriotic Party remained divided over whether to accept his conviction or portray him as a political prisoner.

Mr Agbey also rejected suggestions that Wontumi deserved special treatment because of his political status.

“For God’s sake, it is not President Mahama who incarcerated Wontumi – the courts did,” he stated.

He maintained that anyone seeking presidential clemency should be subjected to the same legal standards as every other prisoner, including serving the required portion of a sentence before being considered.

Mr Agbey further argued that Wontumi “is not a political prisoner but a common criminal found culpable by a court of competent jurisdiction of engaging in criminal conduct,” adding that he “does not deserve sympathy, empathy and clemency for his galamsey-related crimes.”

The NDC operative warned President Mahama against yielding to public pressure.

“President Mahama must not heed this call lest he will face the wrath of the grassroots membership of the National Democratic Congress (NDC),” he said.

He argued that many communities continue to suffer the environmental consequences of illegal mining and insisted that those found guilty of such offences must face the full consequences of the law.

Mr Agbey noted that more than 120 people are currently serving prison sentences for galamsey-related offences and said Wontumi should not receive preferential treatment.

He also pointed to previous administrations, saying former Presidents John Agyekum Kufuor and Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo did not pardon several high-profile convicts despite appeals.

Mr Agbey urged President Mahama to follow the same path and “not be stampeded to truncate the due process in the Wontumi case.”

It’s a shame you want to wash our dirty linen in public – Adwoa Safo slams Akofena

Parliament scraps excise tax on locally made fruit juices

The appointment places the young Ghanaian in one of the Parliament’s key ministerial positions, where he will lead discussions on education policies and defend government positions on issues affecting the education sector during the parliamentary simulation.

Mr Owusu Darko secured the position after impressing fellow delegates with his leadership qualities, debating skills and understanding of governance, marking another milestone for Ghana’s participation in this year’s Commonwealth Youth Parliament.

His election follows his victory at Ghana’s 2026 Commonwealth Day National Debate Competition organised by the Parliament of Ghana, which earned him the opportunity to represent the country at the international programme.

As Education Minister, Titus Owusu Darko is expected to lead discussions on improving access to quality education, promoting innovation in teaching and learning, supporting youth development and strengthening educational collaboration among Commonwealth member countries.

Speaking after his election, Mr Owusu Darko described the appointment as both an honour and a responsibility.

“This is not only a personal achievement but also a proud moment for Ghana. I am honoured by the confidence reposed in me and look forward to contributing meaningfully to discussions on education and youth development across the Commonwealth,” he said.

The Commonwealth Youth Parliament, organised by the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA), brings together young leaders from member countries to experience parliamentary democracy, enhance their legislative and leadership skills, and deliberate on contemporary global issues.

Mr Owusu Darko’s election has been hailed by colleagues and observers as a testament to his leadership abilities and Ghana’s growing influence in youth parliamentary engagements.

His appointment adds to Ghana’s strong showing at the 13th Commonwealth Youth Parliament, where the country continues to make an impact through the achievements of its young delegates.

ALSO:

UniMAC student Agrobesa to represent Ghana at Commonwealth Youth Parliament in Australia

Precious Akos Agrobesa elected Crossbench Whip at Commonwealth Youth Parliament in Australia

Her election places her in a key leadership role ahead of the debate on the Artificial Intelligence and Democratic Integrity Bill 2026.

The proposed legislation seeks to address the growing influence of artificial intelligence on democratic governance, elections, political communication and public trust.

As Crossbench Whip, Ms Agrobesa will coordinate the activities of members of the Green Justice Movement during parliamentary proceedings. Her responsibilities include preparing members for debates, maintaining party discipline, building consensus and helping shape the group’s position on the bill.

The Green Justice Movement serves as the Crossbench Party in the New Albion Parliament and holds the balance of power between the government and opposition.

This gives the group a significant role in determining whether the bill is passed, amended or rejected, making Ms Agrobesa’s leadership crucial to the parliamentary process.

Speaking after her election, she described the opportunity as an honour and privilege, pledging to provide effective leadership as the Crossbench engages with the proposed legislation.

She also expressed her commitment to ensuring that the Green Justice Movement contributes meaningfully to discussions on the responsible use and regulation of artificial intelligence.

The debate is expected to focus on how governments can harness the benefits of AI while protecting electoral integrity, transparency, democratic institutions and public confidence.

Ms Agrobesa’s election marks another milestone for Ghana and the University of Media, Arts and Communication as she takes on a prominent role at the international youth parliamentary gathering.

READ:

UniMAC student Agrobesa to represent Ghana at Commonwealth Youth Parliament in Australia

UniMAC students to represent Ghana at Commonwealth Youth Parliament in Australia