Fixing Ghana’s public transport crisis: Time for bold reform

-

Carbonatix Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Carbonatix

Ghana needs stronger regulation, safer fleets, transparent fares and disciplined implementation to make public transport reliable and sustainable.

Efficient and effective public transportation in any country is essential for economic growth and social inclusion. Studies have shown a relationship between productivity, access to social services, and employment, among others, and the availability of well-coordinated and managed public transport systems.

For the purpose of this write-up, the discussion is confined to public transportation within the road transport sector.

In Ghana, where travel during rush hours from areas such as the University of Ghana to the Central Business District should ideally take no more than 15 minutes but currently exceeds one hour, serious concerns arise regarding the efficiency of the public transport system.

The long-term socio-economic consequences of such inefficiencies on productivity, fuel consumption, environmental sustainability, and quality of life are well documented.

Despite numerous policy interventions by successive governments, Ghana has made limited progress in developing and implementing coherent, sustainable, and cost-effective strategies to address the persistent challenges of the country’s ineffective and inefficient public transport system.

  • State Operators, Weak Regulation and Road Safety

Ghana currently has three main state owned road transport operators: Intercity STC Coaches Ltd, Metro Mass Transit Ltd and Aayalolo. These institutions were established to provide safe, reliable and affordable transport services, and to serve as benchmarks for operational standards. With their experience and assets, they should be strong pillars of Ghana’s public transport system.

Unfortunately, their current technical, financial and operational condition raises serious questions. Aayalolo was introduced as a modern bus service, with buses, technology and institutional arrangements comparable to systems in better-managed cities. Yet, within a few years, the service struggled to survive.

This should force Ghana to ask why promising public transport initiatives fail to deliver sustainable results. Although I am not privy to any formal studies that evaluate and assign specific reasons for the performance of these state-owned institutions, my experience as Managing Director of both ISTC and MMT enables me to attribute the challenges broadly to a combination of internal and external factors.

One major weakness is the regulatory framework. Entry barriers are low, enforcement is weak, and there are limited safeguards for passengers and operators. A proper transport regulatory system should promote fair competition, protect passengers, ensure safety and support financial sustainability.

The expanded mandate of the National Road Safety Authority provides an opportunity to bring stronger discipline into the sector. Ghana needs enforceable standards covering vehicle condition, driver competence, passenger safety, route discipline, terminal management, service reliability and operator accountability.

Driver education and training must also be treated as a national priority. Ghana continues to record unacceptable levels of road traffic crashes, with serious consequences for families, productivity, tourism, health costs and national development. Driver skills and behaviour remain central to reducing crashes. Current training should move beyond basic defensive driving.

The Driver and Vehicle Licensing Authority, National Road Safety Authority and accredited providers should modernise modules for commercial drivers, heavy goods vehicle drivers, motorcycle riders and potential okada operators.

  • Fare Pricing, Fleet Renewal and Policy Recommendations

Passenger fares are another critical issue. Fare increases often lead to tension between passengers and operators, especially when fuel prices rise. Fuel is a major cost component, sometimes accounting for more than 30 per cent of operating cost.

But fare determination cannot be based on fuel alone. Tyres, spare parts, maintenance, insurance, wages, fixed costs and reasonable business margins must also be considered.

Many private operators do not know the true cost of providing services. This partly explains why many trotros are old and poorly maintained. Ghana needs a transparent passenger fare pricing model that reflects both fixed and operating costs, while protecting passengers from arbitrary increases.

  1. Ghana should establish a clear national public transport regulatory framework, led by the Ministry of Transport with the National Road Safety Authority, Driver and Vehicle Licensing Authority and local assemblies. This framework should define minimum standards for vehicle condition, driver competence, terminal operations, route discipline, passenger safety and service quality.
  2. Government should support the gradual replacement of old trotros with high-occupancy buses through structured financing, leasing arrangements and incentives that allow private operators to acquire safer and more efficient buses while operating under regulated routes and schedules.
  3. Intercity STC, Metro Mass Transit and Aayalolo should be restructured under a clearer policy direction. Their roles must be defined to avoid duplication, unhealthy competition and waste. They should become benchmark operators for safety, reliability, maintenance standards and professional transport management.
  4. Ghana needs a transparent passenger fare pricing model. Fare adjustments should be based not only on fuel prices, but also on tyres, spare parts, maintenance, insurance, wages, fixed costs and a reasonable margin for operators. This will protect passengers and sustain operators.
  5. Driver education and training should be modernised to include passenger handling, fatigue management, road safety technology, emergency response, vehicle inspection and professional ethics.
  6. The Ministry of Transport should champion local bus assembly and maintenance capacity, including the revival of the Neoplan Assembly Plant. This would support local industry, reduce import dependence, create jobs and help operators acquire buses suited to Ghanaian conditions.
  7. Technology should be introduced into public transport management. Digital ticketing, GPS tracking, fleet monitoring, route scheduling and fuel management systems can improve revenue control, reduce leakages and make services more predictable.
  • Conclusion: Public Transport as a National Priority

Ghana’s public transport problem can be solved. What is required is bold reform, strong regulation, disciplined implementation and a shift from fragmented transport operations to a modern, safe, reliable and financially sustainable system.

Public transport must be seen as a national development priority. A country that wants to increase productivity, reduce congestion, expand access to jobs and improve quality of life cannot continue to rely on an inefficient and poorly regulated system. Reform is urgent.

About the Author:

Ing. Noble J. Appiah is a transport engineer, transport management expert, and road safety practitioner with over thirty (30) years of experience in the transport industry.

He has served in several executive leadership roles, including Managing Director of Intercity STC Coaches Limited and Metro Mass Transit Limited, Executive Director of the National Road Safety Commission (now the National Road Safety Authority), and Chief Executive of the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Authority. He currently works as a transport management and road safety consultant

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.