Public confidence in Ghana’s public institutions remains low – APL research

-

Carbonatix Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Carbonatix

A new report by policy think tank Africa Policy Lens (APL) has revealed that despite Ghana’s strong democratic credentials, public confidence in governance institutions remains low.

In its maiden Governance Trust Barometer, unveiled in Accra on Wednesday, May 6, 2026, the report noted that persistent gaps between institutional form and functional performance highlight underlying challenges related to trust, accountability, and state effectiveness, which constrain the consolidation of democratic governance in Ghana.

“The Governance and Trust Barometer depicts a national context in which democratic foundations remain robust, yet public trust in governance outcomes is notably fragile,” the report said.

“While institutional structures and procedures continue to function and command a degree of formal legitimacy, perceptions of effectiveness, integrity, and responsiveness lag behind.”

According to APL, the Governance Trust Barometer is grounded in the lived experiences and perceptions of citizens regarding the performance, responsiveness, and credibility of the state across a range of core governance functions. The Barometer integrates eight interrelated domains—institutional trust, perceptions of corruption, accountability and the rule of law, government communication, citizen voice, electoral confidence, political security, and civic participation—into a single composite index scaled from 0 to 100.

Key findings
A stable system with weak perceived integrity
Among its findings, the report noted that Ghana retains strong democratic legitimacy, particularly around elections. However, it said this is undermined by “widespread perceptions of corruption, which remain the single largest drag on overall trust.”

While citizens acknowledge the existence of laws and institutions, the Barometer found that there is a clear perception that accountability is not consistently enforced, creating “a gap between formal governance systems and lived experience.”

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.