properties – Adomonline.com https://www.adomonline.com Your comprehensive news portal Sun, 11 Feb 2024 08:54:35 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1 https://www.adomonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/cropped-Adomonline140-32x32.png properties – Adomonline.com https://www.adomonline.com 32 32 Why Ebony’s ‘properties’ have not been shared – Father reveals [Video] https://www.adomonline.com/why-ebonys-properties-have-not-been-shared-father-reveals-video/ Sun, 11 Feb 2024 08:54:32 +0000 https://www.adomonline.com/?p=2354265 Six years after the tragic death of Ghanaian music sensation, Ebony Reigns, her personal belongings are still intact.

Her father, Starboy Kwarteng said the late Ebony’s properties are still in his possession, untouched and preserved.

In an interview on Adom FM‘s Entertainment Hall, he said he finds solace by meditating with her pictures and clothes.

This emotional attachment, Mr. Kwarteng noted is one of the reasons why he is keeping Ebony’s belongings as a tribute to her legacy.

Traditionally, properties of a deceased are shared a year after death but Starboy Kwarteng opined that, Ebony died too young to have her items distributed.

He explained that, her siblings are all well-accomplished individuals who do not require any of her personal items, hence they have not even made demands for any.

Starboy Kwarteng said as a family, they understand the impact her death has on them, and sharing her belongings is the least on their minds.

Watch video below:

]]>
Property in marriage presumed by law to be acquired jointly – Lawyer https://www.adomonline.com/property-in-marriage-presumed-by-law-to-be-acquired-jointly-lawyer/ Mon, 24 Apr 2023 10:10:23 +0000 https://www.adomonline.com/?p=2242521 Legal practitioner and a partner at Morrison, Twunasi & Partners, Reindorf Twumasi Ankrah, has indicated that the law presumes that assets acquired during a marriage are joint property.

Speaking on The Law on JoyNews, he explained that in the process of a divorce, unless a party can prove otherwise, all joint property will be shared equitably among the divorcees.

“The law now as we have operates on the presumption that property acquired in the course of a marriage is a property jointly acquired by the spouses. So, if a party is disputing the joint ownership of that property, then the burden is on that party to give evidence to establish that with this particular property, we cannot add it to the pool. So, I am rebutting this presumption,” he said.

Speaking on the topic Divorce: Property Distribution, Mr Ankrah highlighted that in the past, the law was designed such that women were expected to have offered monetary assistance before they were acknowledged to have a right to property in the marriage.

Properties in marriage are presumed by law to be acquired jointly – Lawyer

However, since that was disadvantageous to most women, the law had been revised such that a spouse’s right to property in a marriage was not considered solely on monetary contributions, but also on qualitative contributions, he stated.

Mr Ankrah noted that activities that were undertaken by a spouse in managing the home, such as cooking and cleaning among others, comprised qualitative contributions.

These qualitative contributions, he highlighted, were acknowledged by law as a form of assistance that aided a spouse to earn money, even if one of the parties did offer a financial contribution to the marriage.

The legal private practitioner added that should persons such as nannies, cooks, and chefs be employed to render services in the house, they would have been paid.

He also contended that if the woman were to render those services elsewhere, she would have been paid – this contributed to the reason why at the Supreme Court, qualitative contribution is also acknowledged in the determination of a spouse’s share in property distribution.

Subsequently, the lawyer raised the issue of instances where the husband makes his wife quit her job to manage the home.

Mr Ankrah stated that the husband in such a scenario cannot claim that all the properties acquired in the marriage are entirely his.

He explained that “she was an earner and you asked her to come and stay home so effectively you have stopped her from earning money to manage the house. If you were to pay her for that service possibly would even be more than what was earning at work.”

“So, if you’ve asked her to, stay home with all her certificates and all the education she has acquired, you should be ready to accept the fact that if properties are built in the course of the marriage, you cannot claim it to be entirely yours,” he stressed.

]]>
Revealed: Sir John did not declare his assets https://www.adomonline.com/revealed-sir-john-did-not-declare-his-assets/ Tue, 24 May 2022 13:24:21 +0000 https://www.adomonline.com/?p=2117655 The Fourth Estate can report that the late Chief Executive of the Forestry Commission, Kwadwo Owusu Afriyie, whose will has left some Ghanaians in shock and stoked the call for accountability in governance, did not declare his asset while in office.

Popularly called Sir John, Mr. Afriyie was a former general secretary of the governing New Patriotic Party (NPP). He died of Covid-19-related complications on July 1, 2020, while still in office as the head of the Forestry Commission.

The massive wealth he bequeathed to his family and loved ones has shocked many Ghanaians since The Fourth Estate exclusively revealed the contents of his will.

Of particular interest have been the large parcels of land he owned at the Achimota Forest and the Ramsar site, a protected area he had warned people against acquiring land while he was in office.

Some have also questioned when he acquired the properties.

Information The Fourth Estate has requested and received from the Audit Service reveals that Kwadwo Owusu Afriyie did not declare his assets before taking office and did not declare them throughout his tenure as the CEO of the Forestry Commission.

Per the laws regulating asset declaration in Ghana—Article 286 of the 1992 Constitution and Public Office Holders (Declaration of Assets and Disqualification) Act—Mr Afriyie should have declared assets relating to the following:

(a) lands, houses and buildings;
(b) farms;
(c) concessions;
(d) trust or family property in respect of which the officer has beneficial interest;
(e) vehicles, plant and machinery, fishing boats, trawlers, generating plants;
(f) business interests;
(g) securities and bank balances;
(h) bonds and treasury bills;
(i) jewellery of the value of ¢5 million [now ¢500] or above; objects of art of the value of ¢5 million or above;
(j) life and other insurance policies;
(k) such other properties as are specified on the declaration form.

Sir John had a long list of properties including 13 houses at various locations in Accra and Kumasi and his hometown, Sakora Wonoo, in the Ashanti Region. These houses are:

  1. House on plot number GA54480 located in Ogbojo, East Legon, and dated February 12, 2018
  2. House on plot number GA 55329 located at Oyarifa No. 2, dated May 11, 2018
  3. House on plot number GA 55475 located at Oyarifa No.1, dated September 27, 2017
  4. House on plot number GA 5881 located at Adjiringanor, Accra, (white House), dated August 7, 2019.
  5. A 6-bedroom house located at Patangbe, Ogbojo, near East Legon.
  6. A  4-bedroom house located in Mempeheusem, East Legon
  7. A 3-bedroom house on plot number TDA 4140 located in Mempehuesem, East Legon
  8. Another 3-bedroom house on plot number TDA 4140 located in Mempehuesem, East Legon
  9. A 4-bedroom house on plot number GA56838 located in East Legon and dated October 25, 2018
  10. A 5-bedroom house located in Sakora Wonoo
  11. A 4-storey building located in East Legon, with 10 apartments, each apartment consisting of 3-bedrooms; and five apartments, each consisting of two bedrooms
  12. A house at East Legon Hills
  13. A house in Kumasi, Ashanti region

Assets Sir John Acquired while in office

Sir John was appointed the CEO of the Forestry Commission in March 2017

His will does not state when most of the landed properties, money in bank accounts and investments were acquired or the businesses he owned were set up.

However, he named dates along with the registration details of five of the houses in his will. Incidentally, all five dates were while he was the CEO of the Forestry Commission.

When he was just six months in office, his house acquired at Oyarifa No. 1 is dated September 27, 2017 with the registration.

A second house at Ogbojo in Accra is dated February 12, 2018, along with the details in the will.

A third house in Sir John’s collection is dated May 11, 2018, in the will, and a fourth on October 25, 2018.

By his 30th month in office, Sir John, a lawyer NPP’s general secretary from 2010 to 2014, had five houses registered in his name. The fifth one came on August 7, 2019.

Eight other houses contained in his will do not have the dates of acquisition.

His listed wealth also included 12 parcels of land.

Sir John’s will also contains 15 foreign and local bank and investment accounts (both individual and corporate ) with one of the local banks having GH₵ 2 million.

His list of businesses includes a fuel station located at Kentinkrono in the Ashanti Region; 10 fuel tankers (worth about $780,000, according to The Fourth Estate’s checks); one teak plantation located at Nkawie in the Ashanti Region; a rubber plantation located in the Eastern Region; three stalls located at the new Kejetia market in Kumasi, also in the Ashanti Region and Farms at Ejura in the Ashanti Region.

That is not all.

He owned a fleet of 15 private vehicles, including a Lexus LX570, Lexus V6, Mercedes Benz E68 Sport AMG, Honda Pilot V6, Honda Accord Sport, Toyota Landcruiser V8, Ford 150 and Lexus Saloon Car, 2019 model.

The Fourth Estate verifies if Sir John declared his assets

The Fourth Estate has, through a right to information request to the Audit Service, found that Kwadwo Owusu Afriyie, who led the country’s forestry sector regulator for almost four years failed to file his assets and liabilities as required by law.

This is clearly in violation of Article 286(1) of the 1992 Constitution, which required that public office holders declare their assets they hold directly or indirectly before taking office, at the end of every four years; and at the end of their term of office.

The law requires that the President, Vice-President, the Speaker, Deputy Speakers of Parliament, ministers and deputy ministers of state, ambassadors, the Chief Justice and managers of public institutions in which the state has interest to submit to the Auditor-General written declarations of all property or assets owned by, or liabilities owed by them, whether directly or indirectly.

Sir John did not.

Asset declaration just a formality?

Critics of Ghana’s asset declaration laws say it is nothing more than a formality since there is no means to verify what public office holders disclose.

This is because laws forbid public disclosure of the assets declared by the public officers concerned unless demanded as evidence by a court of competent jurisdiction, a commission of inquiry appointed under Article 278 or before an investigator appointed by the Commissioner for Human Rights and Administrative Justice.

But anti-graft crusaders including, Vitus Azeem, a former executive director of the Ghana Integrity Initiative, had described the law as opaque with parliament lacking the will to amend it because it wouldn’t favour public office holders.

“It does not make the law an effective tool to fight corruption,” he said, and points to the possibilities of dodging as the ideal situation should be that the Auditor-General could open the envelope and verify if the assets mentioned did exist or “if it was just a blank sheet that has been put into an envelope”.

The case against asset verification 
There have been a lot of cases made against the verification of assets declared. Civil Society Organisations, including the Centre for Democratic Development (CDD) noted some of these arguments against asset declarations in their research and publications. One argument against closing the assets declared to the public is the socio-cultural setting.

Some argue that in the context of Ghana’s extended family system, which relies heavily on  relatives, disclosing public office holders’ assets would make them vulnerable to undue pressure from needy relatives.

Another justification has been that publicising the assets of public officials could deter “good” persons from entering public service.

However, CDD-Ghana has shredded these arguments describing them as a red herring.

CDD has noted that politicians and other elites are themselves given to needless displays of ostentation and self-importance, mainly as a way of establishing their “big man” credentials and reputation as “patrons”. It argues that it is disingenuous for these same elites to resist the disclosures of their assets on the grounds that it would give undue publicity to the private wealth of public officeholders.

Controversies in the Sir John era as Forestry Commission CEO

During Kwadwo Owusu Afriyie’s tenure of office, the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) released a damning report on the illegal trade and felling of rosewood trees had continued despite a ban being in place since 2012.

“Since 2012, over 540,000 tons of rosewood – the equivalent of 23,478 twenty-foot containers or approximately six million trees – were illegally harvested and imported into China from Ghana while bans on harvest and trade have been in place,” the report said.

The investigations found “a massive institutionalised timber trafficking scheme, enabled by high-level corruption and collusion.”

When he addressed a press conference on September 5, 2019, Kwadwo Owusu Afriyie said from 2012 to May 2019, a total of 300,368.94 cubic metres of rosewood equivalent to 257,230 trees had been exported and not six million trees as alleged by the EIA.

As an antidote to the illegal rosewood trade, he said the commission had decided to among other things, burn all seized rosewood in order to deter people from engaging in cutting down the tree since all other measures had failed.

It didn’t happen.

At the heat of the crackdown on illegal mining (galamsey) in 2018, some residents of Koboro in the Amansie Central District in the Ashanti Region, a notorious illegal mining hub, labelled Sir John as an illegal miner.

In his defence, he explained that he had contracted a company to undertake a reclamation exercise and not an illegal mining activity in the Apamprama Forest located in the area.

MORE:

]]>
Court to rule on motion to auction NAM1’s property Wednesday https://www.adomonline.com/court-to-rule-on-motion-to-auction-nam1s-property-wednesday/ Tue, 18 Jan 2022 17:29:18 +0000 https://www.adomonline.com/?p=2068732 The Financial and Economic Division of the High Court will on Wednesday, January 19, 2022, make orders regarding the property of Nana Appiah Mensah, the Chief Executive Officer of defunct Gold dealership firm Menzgold Ghana Limited.

This was after the Director of the Economic and Organised Crime Office (EOCO) had moved a motion for the property of NAM1 and Menzgold to be auctioned.

In court on Tuesday, January 18, lawyer Abu Issah, for Executive Director of EOCO moved the application for the auctioning of some property of Menzgold and NAM1.

“We have a motion on notice for the discharge of confirmation and further prayer for official auction for the property of respondents (Menzgold) and NAM1,” he said.

MORE:

Moving the application which was filed on November 19, 2021, counsel said, the applicant (EOCO) and other corroborative agencies found out that, the respondents have engaged in money laundering and other serious offences contrary to sections of the EOCO.

The court, presided over by Justice Afia Serwah Asare-Botwe, said the orders of the court would be made ready tomorrow, January 19, 2022.

In January 2019, EOCO froze some accounts of the embattled Chief Executive Officer of gold dealership firm, Menzgold.

EOCO also froze some landed property belonging to the CEO and his firms, and then directed all of its regional directors to look out for such assets in the various regions where Menzgold and its related businesses operated.

]]>
Popular gospel musician loses property to flood [Video] https://www.adomonline.com/popular-gospel-musician-loses-property-to-flood-video/ Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:12:37 +0000 https://www.adomonline.com/?p=1808681 Legendary gospel musician, Stella Aba Seal‘s property were destroyed after her home in Adjiringanor, East Legon got flooded.

According to the musician, formerly known as Stella Dugan, she was away from home for about three days and was welcomed by the flooded room on her return.

“I was electrocuted as I stepped into the water and reached out for an electrician to disconnect the metre and appliances after which some people came to help fetch the watch out,” she narrated.

Recounting the incident in an interview, she explained she will remain strong and appreciate the tragedy that had befallen her since life mattered most.

ALSO READ:

“The Coronavirus has really heightened my appreciation to God and life so I won’t complain but be grateful for this and thank God since the Bible admonishes us to,” she consoled herself.

She expressed faith that God will provide for her just as she said in one of her songs ‘Ontonko’ which literally means God does not slumber, which has been her inspiration since the incident.

She revealed she is currently staying with some well-wishers until her home is cleared.

Watch the video below:

]]>
Photos+Audio: We are ready to die – Doryumu residents to Ghana Railway Authority https://www.adomonline.com/photosaudio-we-are-ready-to-die-doryumu-residents-to-ghana-railway-authority/ Fri, 07 Jun 2019 12:20:42 +0000 https://www.adomonline.com/?p=1671496

Residents of Doryumu and Kordiabe have vowed to resist with their lives attempts by authorities to demolish their houses as part of a railway project.

The two communities are among places affected by the 97 km Tema to Mpakadan railway project.

According to the affected residents, no agreement had been reached so far in the compensation package due them.

ALSO: Audio: Forget about politicians, start a mindset revolution to end perennial floods – Koku tells Ghanaians

They are, therefore, warning the Ghana Railway Development Authority, Shai Osudoku District Assembly among others not to use armed security personnel to carry out any demolition exercise.

“No amount of threats and force will cause us to change our stance. How can you just demolish houses if meetings between parties are inconclusive?” the angry residents asked.

Apart from houses which will be pulled down, residents complained of serious flooding as waterways and access routes are blocked.

residents angry in flood areas
Residents have vowed to resist any attempt to sack them

READ: I can still play minor roles – Grace Nortey

“It’s an eyesore anytime it rains. Was the project intended to better our lives or worsen it?” they asked.

They indicated that the Ghana Railway Development Authority notified residents of the project in 2017 and assured them of compensation for losses.

According to them, no compensation package has been paid, hence threats to use force to demolish about 10 houses for the project are condemnable.

residents
Residents were notified through a letter

In an interview with Adom News, the residents said they will not allow their toil to dissipate in just a day.

Meanwhile, Chief Executive Officer for the Ghana Railway Development Authority, Richard Dombo is allaying fears of the residents.

He said the Authority will prefer to conclude community engagements than resort to brute force despite all the legal backing.

ALSO: Another Burkinabe arrested over terror fears

“Inasmuch as we have all the legal backing, we cannot just go and demolish people’s houses if we have not concluded on a package for them,” he said.

residents angry in flood areas
The angry residents are questioning how their houses can be demolished if meetings between parties are inconclusive

He added that evaluation done in the area is yet to be approved by the Board of Lands Commission, hence no demolition had been sanctioned.

“Though the project, which is to be completed in June 2020, is delaying, we are waiting for the Board to approve the evaluation before we take any action. Compensation for farmers has been approved and we know these affected residents will soon be sorted out,” he assured. 

Source: Adomonline.com | Adom News | Kwame Yankah

]]>