Speaking on JoyNews’ AM Show today, September 30, Mr Poku, a former NPP flagbearer aspirant, passionately challenged the public discourse surrounding the controversial G4O programme, accusing the nation of becoming susceptible to sensational but unfounded claims.

“We should move away from a country of mediocrity to a country of seriousness,” Mr Poku asserted, lamenting what he sees as a decline in rigorous public analysis.

“Ghana is becoming a country where somebody wakes up in the morning and writes an article that pigs can fly, and journalists will start calling all the experts to ask them whether it’s true that pigs can fly. That is where we’re heading to”.

IMANI’s ‘International Audit’ Lacks Credibility

The core of Mr Poku’s criticism targeted IMANI’s recent statement, which was reportedly based on a confidential forensic risk assessment of the G4O programme by an unnamed multinational organisation.

Mr Poku, a veteran of the energy sector with decades of experience, claimed to have reviewed the very document IMANI referenced and found it severely lacking in authenticity and factual basis.

“IMANI, I know Franklin; I know Kofi. But if you read the press statement they put out, they said that they have reviewed an international audit. I have seen that audit they are referring to — there is no name to it, there is no organisation to it, and if you read it, it’s frivolous,” he added.

Mr Poku then issued a direct challenge to the think tank to name its source, arguing that the anonymity renders the document impossible to verify.

“I want to say on national television today, IMANI should come and tell us who authored the assessment. It will help us interrogate it better because, if you read it, it impugns companies’ integrity; it impugns the integrity of technical technocrats and civil servants.”

‘Potential Losses’ and Integrity of Top Officials

The energy analyst focused particularly on the integrity of the individuals involved in managing the multi-billion-dollar scheme, pointing out a key figure whose reputation is allegedly jeopardized by the undocumented report.

“Do you know who was the head of Gold for Oil? Today, the person who is the First Deputy Governor of the BoG was head of Gold for Oil at the Bank of Ghana,” Mr Poku stated, cautioning against the casual defamation of senior public servants based on anonymous data.

He also flatly rejected the financial loss figures cited in the anonymous document, arguing they misunderstand basic industry terminology.

The report, according to IMANI, suggested potential losses amounting to GH¢7.2 billion ($576 million, based on current approximate exchange rates).

Mr Poku argued: “You can’t put this frivolous document in the public domain and talk about potential losses. This 7.2 billion that they talk about—it’s not a loss. They talk about potential—what is potential loss? How does one sit and put something in the public domain and every journalist is feeding on it?”

Tax Exemptions: Industry Standard, Not G4O Malpractice

Mr Poku devoted significant detail to debunking the report’s claims regarding tax exemptions, which it reportedly cited as a major source of loss or malpractice within the G4O framework.

He explained that these exemptions are a standard, well-documented practice within the Ghanaian petroleum industry, independent of the Gold-for-Oil policy.

“When somebody issues a document and says that there are 7.5 legal exemptions—which is what happens in the industry — what they talk about, which is the exemptions in the importation of fuel, it was happening before Gold for Oil, was happening during Gold for Oil, and is happening today,” Mr Poku elaborated.

He stressed that the taxes are not waived entirely but are handled through a recovery mechanism involving the government and the Oil Marketing Companies (OMCs) and Bulk Distribution Companies (BDCs).

“Petroleum products are exempted and the taxes are recovered from you and me at the pump. If you go to GRA today, GRA is in court with a lot of BDCs and OMCs to recover taxes. The NPA boss is with OMC to recover margins. It’s the practice in the industry.”

Concluding his strong denial, Mr Poku, who identifies as a member of a civil society, reiterated his extensive experience in the field to lend weight to his technical refutation:

“I have worked in this industry for 24 years of practical experience working. If there are things that are wrong, I am a member of a civil society; we will point it out. What I am saying is that the document IMANI is referring to—the reason why I am discrediting it is that there is no author, there is no institution to it. All the premises upon which it makes the conclusion is false, 100 percent false.”

The analyst’s comments intensify the debate over the effectiveness and transparency of the G4O scheme, demanding a higher standard of evidence in policy analysis and public discourse.

Source: Myjoyonline

ALSO READ:

• IMANI demands audit as forensic report exposes Gold-for-Oil scandal
• NPP defends Gold-for-Oil programme, rebuts IMANI’s “leakage” claims
• Gold for Oil: BoG confirms GH¢2.14 billion loss but highlights gains  

• Former BOST MD defends ‘gold for oil’ programme, rejects criticism

His conviction, he noted, stems from the posture of the vetting committee when he appeared before them on Monday, July 3, 2023.

The energy expert stated there was no doubt the committee was impressed with his presentation and delivery, hence he received a clap from them afterwards.

“When you finish speaking and people are able to clap for you then it means they are impressed with what you said and at the end, I got a clap,” he said.

Mr Poku disclosed this while addressing journalists after the session which he said was smooth.

“Everything went well, the conversation was smooth. I answered all the questions they asked to the best of my ability but I cannot disclose the content of what I was asked because it’s a family affair and that was why I was the only one allowed into the vetting room,” he said.

Mr Poku was one of the three aspirants including former Trade Minister, Alan Kyerematen and Vice President Dr Bawumia who were vetted on Monday.

He is the only aspirant among the 10 who has not occupied a public office in an NPP government.

Meanwhile, results of the vetting are set to be released by Friday, July 21 with balloting scheduled for Monday, July 24.

ALSO READ:

• It’ll be a good thing to enter a nolle prosequi in Quayson’s case –…

• NPP presidential primaries: Alan appears before Vetting Committee [Photos]

• NPP flagbearer election: Find out who constitutes 900 special delegates

Scores of supporters, clad in NPP paraphernalia were in attendance to support the former Trade Minister at the party headquarters in Asylum Down, Accra.

Addressing teeming supporters after the process, he said it was smooth, adding that he was comfortable because he is familiar with the process.

Mr Kyerematen was the second person to face the committee on the first day of vetting after energy expert, Kwadwo Poku Nsafoa, made his appearance on Monday morning.

Vice President Dr Mahamudu Bawumia is also expected to appear later in the day.

On Tuesday, July 4, the vetting will continue with other candidates, including Boakye Kyeremateng Agyarko, former Energy Minister; Kwabena Agyei Agyepong, a former NPP General Secretary, and Kennedy Ohene Agyapong, the Member of Parliament for Assin Central.

A statement issued by the Secretary to the National Presidential Vetting Committee, Evans Nimako, noted that the remaining candidates would be vetted on July 5 and 6.

The NPP will hold a special congress on August 26, to elect five candidates for the November 4 primary.

To supervise the vetting of the 10 presidential aspirants, the party on Friday, June 30, inaugurated a nine-member vetting committee chaired by a former Speaker of Parliament, Professor Aaron Mike Oquaye.

Below are some more photos of the ongoing process:

ALSO READ:

• NPP race: Alan to meet delegates in public durbars

• Former NPP general secretary exposes scheme to undermine Alan Kyerematen using ‘Alan Cash’ name…